On 8/12/15 12:32 PM, killermoehre wrote:
> Am 12.08.2015 um 20:34 schrieb Harry Goldschmitt:
>> I have a service that has to complete before boot can continue. Is there
>> an “approved” method for doing this?
>>
>>
>>
>> I have an ugly solution I’ve come up with… I’ve created a foo.target to
>> r
On 8/12/15 7:22 PM, Chris Bell wrote:
> On 2015-08-12 20:19, Harry Goldschmitt wrote:
>> I just modified my grub kernel command line to add the consoleblank=0
>> parameter. That isn't the problem. First consoleblank is the kernel
>> screensaver and according to the documentation it kicks in after 1
Thanks to both of you!
> I'd always encourage
> you to fix the daemon in question to make something like the above
> unnecessary.
True. Since I'm only packaging the daemon, I can just guess its written
as it is to make sure the daemon can remove t
On Wed, 12.08.15 18:34, Harry Goldschmitt ([email protected]) wrote:
> I have a service that has to complete before boot can continue. Is
> there an "approved" method for doing this?
Not sure what "boot can continue" is supposed to mean, but all systemd
units support After= and Before
On Sun, 16.08.15 16:36, Malte Forkel ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there some kind of option substitution in unit configuration
> files?
Unit files are supposed to be simply configuration files, not a macro
language. That said there is:
1) Specifier expansion in a number of setti
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Malte Forkel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there some kind of option substitution in unit configuration files?
>
> In a service configuration file, I specify the PID file and would like
> to re-use its name, e.g.
> PIDFile=/var/run/myservice.pid
> ExecStartPre=/usr/
Hi,
Is there some kind of option substitution in unit configuration files?
In a service configuration file, I specify the PID file and would like
to re-use its name, e.g.
PIDFile=/var/run/myservice.pid
ExecStartPre=/usr/bin/touch %PIDFile ; /bin/chown myuser %PIDFile
Thanks,
Malte
_
On Fri, 14.08.15 14:23, Rich Freeman ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 10.08.15 08:03, Rich Freeman ([email protected]) wrote:
> >
> > We have watchdog (see WatchdogSec= documentation in
> > systemd.service(
On Fri, 14.08.15 19:50, Michał Zegan ([email protected]) wrote:
> Actually what is a procedure for more complicated network
> configuration, where you do not have something in networkd?
Well, we try to cover a good chunk of the usecases, but we want be
conservative when exposing options,
On Fri, 14.08.15 21:12, Jayson Willson ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hello. I have realized, that my user (groups:
> tty,disk,mail,news,dialout,voice,sudo,audio,www-data,video,plugdev,users,mlocate,kvm,vboxusers,libvirt)
> can ignore inhibitors (such as root being logged in) using "system
10 matches
Mail list logo
