On Jun 14, 2015 10:11 AM, "Cristian Rodríguez" <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Greg KH
wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:49:55PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
>
>
> Las time I checked , it required this userspace help even when the
> machine ha
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 02:11:53PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:49:55PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
>> >>
>> >> El jun. 14, 2015 10:21, "cee1" escribió:
>
On Sun, 14.06.15 11:17, Igor Bukanov ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that running `systemctl is-enabled foo.service` against a
> service written by a generator fails with a puzzling error message:
>
> Failed to get unit file state for foo.service: No such file or directory
>
> whe
On Fri, 12.06.15 17:50, Peter Paule ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> is there a chance to pass (the given) environment variables down to
> `unicorn` and `delayed_job-worker`?
>
> systemd (host)
> |
>- docker-app.service
> Environment="RAILS_ENV=producti
On Sat, 13.06.15 13:55, Johannes Ernst ([email protected]) wrote:
> > [Match]
> > Type=ethernet
> >
> > [Network]
> > DHCP=ipv4
>
> I did. No change. I do receive the IP address (so DHCP IP assignment is
> working) but I do not receive the DNS server.
No need to have an explicit file fo
On Fri, 12.06.15 17:32, Johannes Ernst ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> I was expecting:
> * container gets an IP address from host in some new subnet: WORKS, e.g
> 10.0.0.2
> * container can route to upstream via IPMasquerade: WORKS, after manual
> 'modprobe iptable_nat'
> * container
On Sun, 14.06.15 15:32, Ansgar Burchardt ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if systemd-networkd could provide an option to control the
> IPv6 privacy extension? It is controlled via a sysctl setting:
>
> net.ipv6.conf.${interface}.use_tempaddr
>
> with three values:
>
> <= 0
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 02:11:53PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:49:55PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
> >>
> >> El jun. 14, 2015 10:21, "cee1" escribió:
> >> >
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > Why we need to read/
On Sun, 14.06.15 14:11, Cristian Rodríguez ([email protected])
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:49:55PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
> >>
> >> El jun. 14, 2015 10:21, "cee1" escribió:
> >> >
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > Wh
Thomasz,
Really appreciate your helps. It works perfectly now after taking your
instructions.
--Regards,Eric Lu
On Sunday, June 14, 2015 2:39 AM, Tomasz Torcz
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:39:24PM -0700, Eric Lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I tested the functionality of system.pa
On 2015-06-14 06:05, Duncan wrote:
> Goffredo Baroncelli posted on Sat, 13 Jun 2015 17:09:19 +0200 as
> excerpted:
>
>> My attempt followed a different idea: the mount helper waits the devices
>> if needed, or if it is the case it mounts the filesystem in degraded
>> mode.
>> All devices are passe
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:49:55PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
>>
>> El jun. 14, 2015 10:21, "cee1" escribió:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Why we need to read/save random seed? Can it be read from /dev/random each
>> time?
>>
>> Because the ke
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:49:55PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
>
> El jun. 14, 2015 10:21, "cee1" escribió:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Why we need to read/save random seed? Can it be read from /dev/random each
> time?
>
> Because the kernel is borked and still is needs to be fed of entropy at
El jun. 14, 2015 10:21, "cee1" escribió:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Why we need to read/save random seed? Can it be read from /dev/random
each time?
Because the kernel is borked and still is needs to be fed of entropy at
system startup by user space. Please read the random man page.
I agree we shouldn't ha
Hi,
I'm wondering if systemd-networkd could provide an option to control the
IPv6 privacy extension? It is controlled via a sysctl setting:
net.ipv6.conf.${interface}.use_tempaddr
with three values:
<= 0 : disable Privacy Extensions
== 1 : enable Privacy Extensions, but prefer public
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 4:21 PM, cee1 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Why we need to read/save random seed? Can it be read from /dev/random each
> time?
Well, that would sorta defeat the point.
The random seed isn't for systemd's use. On boot, it is *written to*
/dev/random,
not read from it. Early durin
Hi all,
Why we need to read/save random seed? Can it be read from /dev/random each time?
--
Regards,
- cee1
___
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Hi all,
I've recently got another chance to improve the boot-time of a
systemd-based device. I'd like to share the experience here, and some
thoughts and questions.
The first time I tried to improve the boot-time of systemd:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2011-March/001707.ht
В Sun, 14 Jun 2015 12:36:39 +0200
Igor Bukanov пишет:
> On 14 June 2015 at 12:22, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > So it can be discussed what should be returned in this case, but in any
> > case "systemctl is-enabled" is not expected to return "enabled-runtime"
> > here.
>
> Indeed, I see that it s
On 14 June 2015 at 12:22, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> So it can be discussed what should be returned in this case, but in any
> case "systemctl is-enabled" is not expected to return "enabled-runtime"
> here.
Indeed, I see that it should not be `enabled-runtime"` as the unit
does not contain [Instal
В Sun, 14 Jun 2015 12:16:09 +0200
Igor Bukanov пишет:
> On 14 June 2015 at 12:10, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > Not really. systemctl enable|disable|is-enabled explicitly work on
> > links defined by [Install] section only.
>
> This is not true. According to systemctl is-enabled man page for
> se
On 14 June 2015 at 12:10, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> Not really. systemctl enable|disable|is-enabled explicitly work on
> links defined by [Install] section only.
This is not true. According to systemctl is-enabled man page for
services without [Install] the command should succeed and print
static
The reason for .d + .conf, not .wants, is that in my case .conf file
contains several Wants directives including one for a service that is
installed but not not enabled by default. As I do not know the
location of that service unit file (depending on OS or installation it
can be under /usr/lib, /us
В Sun, 14 Jun 2015 11:17:03 +0200
Igor Bukanov пишет:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that running `systemctl is-enabled foo.service` against a
> service written by a generator fails with a puzzling error message:
>
> Failed to get unit file state for foo.service: No such file or directory
>
> when I e
2015-06-14 11:17 GMT+02:00 Igor Bukanov :
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that running `systemctl is-enabled foo.service` against a
> service written by a generator fails with a puzzling error message:
>
> Failed to get unit file state for foo.service: No such file or directory
>
> when I expected that the
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:39:24PM -0700, Eric Lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I tested the functionality of system.path in a Fedora 21 workstation. The
> script was executed even though the file specified in PathExists=,
> /var/tmp/tst0, did not exist. Is there something I misunderstand or
:
>
Hello,
I noticed that running `systemctl is-enabled foo.service` against a
service written by a generator fails with a puzzling error message:
Failed to get unit file state for foo.service: No such file or directory
when I expected that the command succeeds and prints enabled-runtime
as the unit
27 matches
Mail list logo
