Hi Systemd devs :
We have some scripts that depend on the kernel printing "Restarting
system." when a "reboot" command is issued on the console.
Unfortunately we are not seeing such a message just before reboot. It
seems that the reboot() syscall is not even getting invoked by
start_special(). Do
Lennart Poettering poettering.net> writes:
>
> On Mon, 06.01.14 11:04, Holger Schurig (holgerschurig gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Hi, I used "ip netns" commands to setup several network namespaces.
> > Now I want to run a user-space (non-root) in one of those netspaces.
> > "ip netns exec NAME COMM
Hi!
On 09/04/15 12:45, Patrik Flykt wrote:
>> Hmm, in general, we really should try to create the same binaries,
>> > regardless if we are built on an old or new kernel. And the binaries
>> > should work as good as possible, regardless which kernel version they
>> > are running on. But with the ch
This tiny daemon enables to pull journal entries and push to a UDP
multicast address in syslog RFC 5424 format. systemd-journal-syslogd
runs with own user systemd-journal-syslog. It starts running after
the network is up.
V2: Address Zbigniew's comments
1. Rename binary systemd-journal-
On 04/09/2015 02:02 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 18.03.15 11:00, Susant Sahani (sus...@redhat.com) wrote:
Sorry for the late review!
Thanks for the review .
+systemd-journal-syslogd serves journal
+events over the network. It multicasts journal event to Syslog RFC 5424
Am 09.04.2015 um 19:05 schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.04.2015 um 18:52 schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
We generally follow the rule: we develop for the future, not for the
past. A file sy
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 09.04.2015 um 18:52 schrieb Kay Sievers:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
>> wrote:
>>
We generally follow the rule: we develop for the future, not for the
past. A file system like ext234 is clearly
Am 09.04.2015 um 18:52 schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
We generally follow the rule: we develop for the future, not for the
past. A file system like ext234 is clearly not the future,
A filesystem like ext is being actively developed,mainta
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
>> We generally follow the rule: we develop for the future, not for the
>> past. A file system like ext234 is clearly not the future,
>
> A filesystem like ext is being actively developed,maintained and new
> features being added to i
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 16.03.15 11:29, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
>>
>> I would like to pass the time it was spent in bootloader to systemd.
>> Is there a kernel command line to pass this information on non EFI
>> bootloader? Or
On Thu, 09.04.15 15:20, Michal Sekletar (msekl...@redhat.com) wrote:
> +quotes = chars_intersect(service, SHELL_NEED_QUOTES);
> +
> +service_maybe_quoted = alloca(strlen(service) + 3);
> +sprintf(service_maybe_quoted, "%s%s%s", quotes ? "'" : "",
> service, quotes ? "'" : "
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 05:30:44PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 03:24:54PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 05:20:43PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 02:44:38PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wro
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 03:24:54PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 05:20:43PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 02:44:38PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 04:35:53PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> >
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 05:20:43PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 02:44:38PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 04:35:53PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 02:10:14PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wro
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 01:47:40PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:31:31AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > What I'm proposing is that we dropped that proof of concept since
> > it's not being maintained, there exist better alternatives thus it's
> >
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 02:44:38PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 04:35:53PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 02:10:14PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 03:20:02PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> >
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 04:35:53PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 02:10:14PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 03:20:02PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> > > Users might have hard time figuring out why exactly their systemctl
> > > reque
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 02:10:14PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 03:20:02PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> > Users might have hard time figuring out why exactly their systemctl request
> > failed. If dbus job fails try to figure out more details about failure
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 02:10:14PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 03:20:02PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> > Users might have hard time figuring out why exactly their systemctl request
> > failed. If dbus job fails try to figure out more details about failure
I usually have two network interfaces on my laptops (one eth and one
wlan), and when I was using sysvinit I also was configuring the bond
interface via the /etc/network/interfaces file so the two interfaces
could work in the active-backup mode. But now, they work in balance-rr
mode which is set via
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 03:20:02PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> Users might have hard time figuring out why exactly their systemctl request
> failed. If dbus job fails try to figure out more details about failure by
> examining Result property of the service.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 01:13:23PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Sun, 15.03.15 17:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> (zbys...@kemper.freedesktop.org) wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/src/vconsole/vconsole-setup.c b/src/vconsole/vconsole-setup.c
> > index bf681d9..fe8573f 100644
> > --- a/src/vcon
Users might have hard time figuring out why exactly their systemctl request
failed. If dbus job fails try to figure out more details about failure by
examining Result property of the service.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016680
---
src/libsystemd/sd-bus/bus-util.c | 41 +++
On 04/09/2015 11:04 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 09.04.15 10:51, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
My above questions where directed directly at Lennart since you cannot know
if Lennart's assumption which he bases his decisions on are
premature,correct, wrong or misgu
On Sat, 14.03.15 09:14, Paul Menzel (paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net) wrote:
> Dear systemd folks,
>
>
> using Debian Sid/unstable with systemd 215-12, I attached to it with GDB
> to analyze some things. Attached with `gdb --pid 1` worked.
>
> But continuing the execution and then hitting Ctr
On Fri, 13.03.15 12:25, Michael Marineau (michael.marin...@coreos.com) wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Currently systemd-timesyncd.service includes
> ConditionVirtualization=no, disabling it in both containers and
> virtual machines. Each VM platform tends to deal with or ignore the
> time problem in the
On Sun, 15.03.15 17:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
(zbys...@kemper.freedesktop.org) wrote:
> diff --git a/src/vconsole/vconsole-setup.c b/src/vconsole/vconsole-setup.c
> index bf681d9..fe8573f 100644
> --- a/src/vconsole/vconsole-setup.c
> +++ b/src/vconsole/vconsole-setup.c
> @@ -96,16 +96,14 @
On Thu, 09.04.15 10:51, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
> My above questions where directed directly at Lennart since you cannot know
> if Lennart's assumption which he bases his decisions on are
> premature,correct, wrong or misguided until you know what those assumptions
> are.
On 04/09/2015 10:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.04.2015 um 12:17 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 04/09/2015 08:54 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Of course, this only works for GPT systems, i.e. modern systems, and
modern systems probably wouldn't run ext234 anyway, so maybe it's not
wort
On Thu, 09.04.15 12:26, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > order it after the precise units you need from early boot,
>
> This is fragile because it will break every time "precise units"
> change. This is exact reason
On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 12:43 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Hmm, in general, we really should try to create the same binaries,
> regardless if we are built on an old or new kernel. And the binaries
> should work as good as possible, regardless which kernel version they
> are running on. But with
On Thu, 09.04.15 13:37, Patrik Flykt (patrik.fl...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
> src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-types.c | 2 ++
> src/network/networkd-address.c | 5 +++-
> src/network/networkd-dhcp6.c| 55
> +++--
> src/network/networkd-link.c |
When setting IPv6 addresses acquired by DHCPv6, systemd-networkd sets
the IFA_F_NOPREFIXROUTE flag in the IFA_FLAGS netlink attribute. As the
flag and the attribute are present starting with Linux 3.14, older
kernels will need systemd-network to manage prefix route handling.
Support for IFA_FLAGS
Am 09.04.2015 um 12:17 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 04/09/2015 08:54 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Of course, this only works for GPT systems, i.e. modern systems, and
modern systems probably wouldn't run ext234 anyway, so maybe it's not
worth it... Actually neither xfs nor btrfs nor reise
On 08/04/15 20:11, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Right, we have to find out what we want to support here, cross-compile
> or secondary arch things.
>
> Only one thing is clear at the moment, that the current status makes
> no sense. :)
>
> We got $libdir for the secondary arch:
>
> http://cgit.freedesk
On 04/09/2015 08:54 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Of course, this only works for GPT systems, i.e. modern systems, and
modern systems probably wouldn't run ext234 anyway, so maybe it's not
worth it... Actually neither xfs nor btrfs nor reiserfs appear to
require an fsck still, it's only ext234 an
On Mon, 16.03.15 11:29, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to pass the time it was spent in bootloader to systemd.
> Is there a kernel command line to pass this information on non EFI
> bootloader? Or is there an another way?
I am open to add this, but I rea
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> order it after the precise units you need from early boot,
This is fragile because it will break every time "precise units"
change. This is exact reason why we have systemd.special man page at
all - to provide high level synchronization
On Thu, 09.04.15 11:09, Mikhail Morfikov (mmorfi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> And in the /etc/systemd/resolved.conf file I set DNS=127.0.2.1 only,
> and the two interfaces looks like this:
> # networkctl status -a
> ...
> ● 6: br_lxc
>Link File: n/a
> Network File: /etc/systemd/network/30-br_lxc-sta
On Wed, 18.03.15 17:10, Christoph Pleger (christoph.ple...@cs.tu-dortmund.de)
wrote:
Warming up this old thread...
> Why does systemd not follow the above instructions to start the services
> of test.target after those of basic.target and before those of
> multi-user.target?
I figure this trhea
I think I get it now. I have two interfaces that have different DNS
servers set -- bond0 and br_lxc. All of the LXC containers use my
router's DNS and everything else uses 127.0.2.1 . The config file for
the br_lxc interface looks like this:
[Match]
Name=br_lxc
[Network]
Description=LXC bridge co
On Sun, 15.03.15 21:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> So this used to to be possible for ext4, by setting "mount count" one
> below the "mount limit". But "mount limit" now defaults to disabled, so
> this stopped being possible.
>
> Also, this suffers from the same prob
On Wed, 18.03.15 11:00, Susant Sahani (sus...@redhat.com) wrote:
Sorry for the late review!
> +systemd-journal-syslogd serves journal
> +events over the network. It multicasts journal event to Syslog RFC 5424
> format.
> +
The tool can also be used to unicast events, no? Maybe clar
On Thu, 09.04.15 14:52, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
> I know, this is very strange and seems not cool. And maybe the
> activation will really slow. But seems not impossible.
Well, if something is ugly, then this is often a hint that it might
not be thought to the end, or might ul
On Thu, 09.04.15 00:01, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 17.03.15 10:54, Peter Paule (systemd-de...@fedux.org) wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> does it make sense to check if the system is started as a cont
On Thu, 09.04.15 14:10, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
> >> In recent systemd(from some month ago), when a unit has a mask for cpu
> >> or blockio or memory, this mask is also propagated to siblings by
> >> unit_get_target_mask().
> >> According to some of comments, it seems intentio
Hi Lennart,
that does sound interesting. Let me polish my patches for stateless
systems on real hardware a bit first though:-) It would give a
horrible impression if the system would not come up properly, just
because you forgot to pass root= to the kernel. Sorry for the delay, I
was on vacation o
47 matches
Mail list logo
