Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
> I pushed your patch with some significant changes, and some follow-up
> cleanups. Please check that things work for you.
>
> The problem with reading but back discards settings remains.
>
> Zbyszek
It works for me, thanks!
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer,
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:23:30PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> Ping, could anybody comment, please?
> C'mon, it's been four days, two of that being the weekend.
Sorry for that, it felt like way over a week already...
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red H
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 05:51:45PM +0200, Marius Tessmann wrote:
> Since commit b1e90ec515408aec2702522f6f68c4920b56375b systemd passes
> its log settings to systemd-shutdown via command line parameters.
> However, systemd-shutdown doesn't pass these parameters to
> /run/initramfs/shutdown, causing
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 06:12:51PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> move each user/group creation to a file that represents its own split
> package, so it's possible to ship them in separate.
> ---
> Makefile.am| 33 +++--
> sysusers.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 06:12:50PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> etc.conf was selectively (using m4) using resolved link, now this is
> moved to systemd-resolved.conf file. The etc.conf can be static and
> does not need to be generated anymore.
>
> systemd.conf was doing all the journal
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get a timeout in the Fedora 21 alpha:
>
> [ TIME ] Timed out waiting for device
> dev-disk-by\x2duuid-008af19d\x2d2562\x2d49bd\x2d8907\x2d721ea08f3e14.device.
>
> But all devices are available from early kernel start:
> # ls -l /dev
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 06:12:50PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> etc.conf was selectively (using m4) using resolved link, now this is
> moved to systemd-resolved.conf file. The etc.conf can be static and
> does not need to be generated anymore.
>
> systemd.conf was doing all the journal
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:55:09AM -0700, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> src/nspawn/nspawn.c | 13 ++---
> src/shared/util.c | 18 ++
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> New commits:
> commit 9fb02b1d5df153aa522256aec821e422cca7f284
> Author: Tom Gunderse
Hi,
I get a timeout in the Fedora 21 alpha:
[ TIME ] Timed out waiting for device
dev-disk-by\x2duuid-008af19d\x2d2562\x2d49bd\x2d8907\x2d721ea08f3e14.device.
But all devices are available from early kernel start:
# ls -l /dev/disk/by-uuid/
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Sep 29 20:17 008af19
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:35:04PM +0400, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> В Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:16:25 +0200
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek пишет:
>
> >
> > The problem with reading but back discards settings remains.
> >
>
> Seems like the most natural solution is to extend /proc/swaps. The only
> pl
В Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:16:25 +0200
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek пишет:
>
> The problem with reading but back discards settings remains.
>
Seems like the most natural solution is to extend /proc/swaps. The only
place where these flags are printed right now is in dmesg during swapon.
_
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 02:41:28PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:23:30PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
> > Jan Synacek writes:
> > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
> > >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 02:29:05PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
> > >>> Process possibl
Hi,
I have stumbled on a race condition on systemd-run --scope command.
Due to race condition, unit might show up as active/running even
though there is no process in the cgroup.
My best guess is we are missing the cgroup notification but when?
- Could it be that before systemd processes StartTr
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:23:30PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
> Jan Synacek writes:
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
> >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 02:29:05PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
> >>> Process possible "discard" values from /etc/fstab.
> >> Hm, wouldn't it be enough to simply pass throu
Jan Synacek writes:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 02:29:05PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
>>> Process possible "discard" values from /etc/fstab.
>> Hm, wouldn't it be enough to simply pass through the options like with
>> mounts, using the Options= option? This mig
David Herrmann wrote on 29/09/14 08:53:
> Hi
>
> (please put the mailing-list on CC; or use "Reply-All")
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Thomas Antony wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> This depends on the session-manager you use.. but as a heads-up: most
>>> session-managers only allow a single instance
Hi
(please put the mailing-list on CC; or use "Reply-All")
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Thomas Antony wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> This depends on the session-manager you use.. but as a heads-up: most
>> session-managers only allow a single instance per seat (which makes
>> sense..).
>
>
> I have insta
17 matches
Mail list logo
