Hey Dan-
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Dan Mace wrote:
> This is on my backburner at the moment while I work on some other things.
Did you ever try things out with Go 1.3?
Thanks!
Brandon
___
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
Thanks!
Fixed.
Tom
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:00 PM, poma wrote:
>
> systemd-215gitccf1c02
>
> [21.456752] systemd[1]: Starting Network Service...
>
> [21.935209] sd-nd[630]: Assertion 'link->network->ipv4ll' failed at
> ../src/network/networkd-dhcp4.c:578, function dhcp4_configure(). Aborti
systemd-215gitccf1c02
[21.456752] systemd[1]: Starting Network Service...
[21.935209] sd-nd[630]: Assertion 'link->network->ipv4ll' failed at
../src/network/networkd-dhcp4.c:578, function dhcp4_configure(). Aborting.
[21.960142] systemd[1]: sd-nd.service: main process exited, code=killed,
s
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Anatol Pomozov
wrote:
> Thanks for the instructions, here is the log
> https://gist.github.com/anatol/cb497118cfad6af3dc60
>
> The interesting entries are:
> Aug 11 17:30:25 theserver systemd-networkd[32648]: ICMPv6 CLIENT:
> Received Router Advertisment flags MANA
On Tue, 12.08.14 17:01, Michael Olbrich ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Without IPv6 systemd-resolved fails to start with:
>
> Failed to start manager: Address family not supported by protocol
>
> strace tells me this is the errno from socket():
> [...]
> socket(PF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM
Hi,
Without IPv6 systemd-resolved fails to start with:
Failed to start manager: Address family not supported by protocol
strace tells me this is the errno from socket():
[...]
socket(PF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC|SOCK_NONBLOCK, IPPROTO_IP) = -1
EAFNOSUPPORT (Address family not supported by
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 01:12 +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > The caller may have an existing DUID that it wants to use, and may
> > want to use some other DUID generation scheme than systemd's
> > default DUID-EN.
>
> I have no objections a pri
Leonid Isaev wrote on 11/08/14 18:22:
> Hi,
>
> I am seeing an oddity in the CGroup output of systemctl status ran on
> some units. On the other hand, systemd-cgls shows correct information.
> Here is an example:
> --
> $ systemctl status [email protected]
> [email protected] -
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 06:09:44PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Michael Olbrich
> wrote:
> > with the current git master (v215-293-g4e6029435111) restarting
> > systemd-networkd triggers an assert() here:
> >
> > In netdev_join_handler():
> > assert(IN_SET
