In kdump kernel, we need mount certain file system, and we use "nofail"
for all mounts specified in /etc/fstab. Because we don't want any mount
failure to interrupt the boot process to arrive at
dracut-pre-pivot.service (This is the point just before we switch root).
And at that dracut-pre-pivot, w
On 04/03/2014 05:17 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 08:52:06AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> From: Greg KH
>>
>> If the kernel is started with "debug", that's for the kernel to switch
>> into debug mode. We should rely on a namespace for our options, like
>> everything else (with
Add Mir to the list of session types. This is implemented for LightDM
in lp:~robert-ancell/lightdm/xdg-session-desktop [1].
[1]
https://code.launchpad.net/~robert-ancell/lightdm/xdg-session-desktop/+merge/214108
---
man/pam_systemd.xml | 5 +++--
man/sd_session_is_active.xml | 6 +++---
-1 on adding ConditionACPower=true
I frequently only plug in my laptop after putting it to sleep and then
disconnect it before waking it up again. It'd be possible to run
cleanup less frequently when on battery, but that would just delay the
work and increase the impact (which is pretty negligible
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Florian Albrechtskirchinger
wrote:
> Both you and Tom Gundersen raised the point of assisting end-users with
> boot issues. 'dbg' (as suggested, shorthand for 'dbg=kri') is as
> concise and simple as it gets.
-1 on this because it moves in the opposite direction o
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On a battery-powered system, they are most likely clean due to small
> uptime.
I can't agree.
Nowadays battery-powered systems tend to have huge uptimes
due to being mostly suspended and rarely powered-off/rebooted.
Anyway, I think Tomasz
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 21:26:23 +0200
Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 03:42:08PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
> > While it is cool to be neat and clean all the time, this
> > task can wait if we are on battery.
>
> What if I connect my laptop to AC only when it sleeps? This will
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 03:42:08PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
> While it is cool to be neat and clean all the time, this
> task can wait if we are on battery.
What if I connect my laptop to AC only when it sleeps? This will
never run. I also don't think couple stats() and rm's have any
me
Return negative errno in wall_tty_block(). get_ctty_devnr() already
returns a negative errno in case of failure, no need to negate it again.
Reported-by: Simon
---
src/tty-ask-password-agent/tty-ask-password-agent.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/tty-ask-
On 03.04.2014 15:48, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Florian Albrechtskirchinger at 03/04/14 11:53 did
> gyre and gimble:
>
>> I suggest we return the 'debug' option to the kernel folk and add a new
>> option 'dbg' with a string of single letter arguments. For example,
>> 'dbg=ki' (k for
Hello,
I think I may have found an error in systemd source, in
tty-ask-password-agent.c, fuction wall_tty_block :
r = get_ctty_devnr(0, &devnr);
if (r < 0)
return -r;
shouldn’t be "return -r" be "return r" ?
Regards,
Simon
__
While it is cool to be neat and clean all the time, this
task can wait if we are on battery.
---
units/systemd-tmpfiles-clean.service.in | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/units/systemd-tmpfiles-clean.service.in
b/units/systemd-tmpfiles-clean.service.in
index a5b5acb..06bb21f 100
On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 18:53:48 +0100
John Lane wrote:
> On 03/04/14 16:40, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:25:27 +0100
> > John Lane wrote:
> >
> >> Hello, I have a number of LXC containers that have been working with
> >> systemd for some time. I have just tried to perf
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 08:18:26AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:08:15PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > From: Greg KH
> >
> > If the kernel is started with "debug", that's for the kernel to switch
> > into debug mode. We should rely on a namespace for our options, like
>
On 03/04/14 16:40, Leonid Isaev wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:25:27 +0100
John Lane wrote:
Hello, I have a number of LXC containers that have been working with
systemd for some time. I have just tried to perform some upgrades,
taking them from 204 to 212 (actually they are scripted rebuil
Hi,
There are plenty people who have some kind of automatic session unlocking
set up.
Examples are: BT phone proximity, USB-drive being plugged in, etc.
This is normally done via DBus `ScreenSaver.SetActive(false)` call, but
this interface is not
well-documented and, actually, it seems that this c
Hi,
Seems the upstream audit package includes this unit:
[Unit]
Description=Security Auditing Service
DefaultDependencies=no
After=local-fs.target
Conflicts=shutdown.target
Before=sysinit.target shutdown.target
RefuseManualStop=yes
[Service]
ExecStart=/sbin/auditd -n
## To use augenrules, copy t
2014-04-03 17:13 GMT+02:00 Barry Scott :
> How should I be doing this?
As I don't know if your script is meant to mount arbitrary removable
drives, if you just want to mount a specific device, the simplest
solution is to just add it to /etc/fstab.
Use somehting like UUID or LABEL to identify it, a
Over at Gentoo, we have started installing fsck.vfat in /usr/sbin rather
than /sbin. Don't ask me why; I don't maintain our dosfstools package. ^_^
This works ok with the fsck binary from util-linux since we have it
configured to search in /usr/sbin via the --enable-fs-paths-extra configure
option
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Susant Sahani wrote:
> I am trying to fix the broken test cases which was working previously .
> With the new refactorization and I tryied to fix them with the attached
> paatch does not work . Not sure I am doing something wrong or sd-rtnl is
> broken.
Thank
Hi,
On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:25:27 +0100
John Lane wrote:
> Hello, I have a number of LXC containers that have been working with
> systemd for some time. I have just tried to perform some upgrades,
> taking them from 204 to 212 (actually they are scripted rebuilds rather
> than upgrades).
You
2014-04-03 17:27 GMT+02:00 Thomas Bächler :
> Am 03.04.2014 17:13, schrieb Barry Scott:
>> But as soon as the script exits the mount.ntfs process is killed off by
>> something? systemd-udevd maybe?
>
> From man udev's section on RUN:
>
> " This can only be used for very short-running fore
2014-04-03 17:13 GMT+02:00 Barry Scott :
> More of my porting from F16 to F20.
>
>
>
> I have the following in /etc/udev/rules.d
>
>
>
> ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="block", SUBSYSTEMS=="usb",
> RUN+="/usr/local/onelan/ntb/bin/ntb_mount_usb"
>
> ACTION=="remove", SUBSYSTEM=="block", SUBSYSTEMS=="usb"
Am 03.04.2014 17:13, schrieb Barry Scott:
> But as soon as the script exits the mount.ntfs process is killed off by
> something? systemd-udevd maybe?
From man udev's section on RUN:
" This can only be used for very short-running foreground
tasks. Running an event process for a long peri
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:08:15PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> From: Greg KH
>
> If the kernel is started with "debug", that's for the kernel to switch
> into debug mode. We should rely on a namespace for our options, like
> everything else (with the exception of "quiet"). Some people want
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 08:52:06AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> From: Greg KH
>
> If the kernel is started with "debug", that's for the kernel to switch
> into debug mode. We should rely on a namespace for our options, like
> everything else (with the exception of "quiet"). Some people want
More of my porting from F16 to F20.
I have the following in /etc/udev/rules.d
ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="block", SUBSYSTEMS=="usb",
RUN+="/usr/local/onelan/ntb/bin/ntb_mount_usb"
ACTION=="remove", SUBSYSTEM=="block", SUBSYSTEMS=="usb",
RUN+="/usr/local/onelan/ntb/bin/ntb_mount_usb"
This run th
From: Greg KH
If the kernel is started with "debug", that's for the kernel to switch
into debug mode. We should rely on a namespace for our options, like
everything else (with the exception of "quiet"). Some people want to
only debug the kernel, not systemd, and the opposite as well so make
eve
Applied. Thanks!
Cheers,
Tom
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
> ---
> src/network/networkd-link.c | 22 ++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/network/networkd-link.c b/src/network/networkd-link.c
> index 973755a..4e0fe0a
Applied. Thanks!
Cheers,
Tom
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
> Currently when both ipv4ll and dhcp are enabled, ipv4ll
> address (if one has been claimed) is removed when dhcp
> address is aquired. This is not the best thing to do
> since there might be clients una
On 04/03/2014 01:02 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Hannes Reinecke at 03/04/14 07:52 did gyre and gimble:
>> "systemd.restore_state=0|1
>> Restore backlight/rfkill state at boot\n");
>> + "systemd.debug
'Twas brillig, and Florian Albrechtskirchinger at 03/04/14 11:53 did
gyre and gimble:
> On 03.04.2014 00:27, Greg KH wrote:
>> If the kernel is started with "debug", that's for the kernel to
>> switch into debug mode. We should rely on a namespace for our
>> options, like everything else (with the
'Twas brillig, and Hannes Reinecke at 03/04/14 07:52 did gyre and gimble:
> "systemd.restore_state=0|1
> Restore backlight/rfkill state at boot\n");
> + "systemd.debug
> Enable debugging ou
Am 12.02.2014 21:19, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> On Wed, 12.02.14 20:05, Reindl Harald ([email protected]) wrote:
>> maybe systemd-upstream should consider slow down development
>> and spend more energy in quality and stability
>
> Well, firstly, it's hardly your business how we spend our
On 03.04.2014 00:27, Greg KH wrote:
> If the kernel is started with "debug", that's for the kernel to
> switch into debug mode. We should rely on a namespace for our
> options, like everything else (with the exception of "quiet"). Some
> people want to only debug the kernel, not systemd, and the
Am 03.04.2014 11:36, schrieb David Herrmann:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> Or is there actually a bug going on here? My impression from reading
>> related discussions was that "systemd.log_level=debug loglevel=debug"
>> triggers some bug (so in particular "debug" now t
'Twas brillig, and Greg KH at 03/04/14 02:02 did gyre and gimble:
> +} else if (streq(key, "systemd.debug") && !value) {
Just as a small not to user typos, perhaps we should also check for
"system.debug"? It's a bit of a namespace crime, but it might avoid some
unneeded round trips request
Hello, I have a number of LXC containers that have been working with
systemd for some time. I have just tried to perform some upgrades,
taking them from 204 to 212 (actually they are scripted rebuilds rather
than upgrades).
I have found that they do not work properly with any systemd versions
Hi
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Or is there actually a bug going on here? My impression from reading
> related discussions was that "systemd.log_level=debug loglevel=debug"
> triggers some bug (so in particular "debug" now triggers the bug). It
> was not clear to me whe
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Is the rationale for this, simply a matter of preference, i.e., is the
> claim simply that we believe most users would benefit more from the
> 'kernel only' compared to 'all low-level stuff' behavior? If that's
> the case, I don't have an opi
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> If the kernel is started with "debug", that's for the kernel to switch
> into debug mode. We should rely on a namespace for our options, like
> everything else (with the exception of "quiet").
Just a quick note, we do in fact read a lot of kernel
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Patrik Flykt
wrote:
> Section 4.4.1 in RFC 2131 says that a DHCP client SHOULD wait a
> random time between one and ten seconds to desynchronize DHCP
> clients on startup. This is supported such that the application
> can optionally set an initial delay of approxima
Hi,
I am trying to fix the broken test cases which was working
previously . With the new refactorization and I tryied to fix them with
the attached paatch does not work . Not sure I am doing something wrong
or sd-rtnl is broken.
--
Thanks !
Susant
>From 51e8b0a3d18f892c2e0bb86ca86fab995
On Wednesday 02 April 2014 at 12:00:07, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Ivan Shapovalov
wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I've noticed that systemd-networkd.service (ordered Before=network.target)
> > finishes its startup before the connection is est
Section 4.4.1 in RFC 2131 says that a DHCP client SHOULD wait a
random time between one and ten seconds to desynchronize DHCP
clients on startup. This is supported such that the application
can optionally set an initial delay of approximately two and eight
seconds or leave the initial value unset r
45 matches
Mail list logo
