On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 01:34:57AM +0100, Ronny Chevalier wrote:
> ---
> test/TEST-04-SECCOMP/Makefile | 1 +
> test/TEST-04-SECCOMP/test-seccomp.sh| 11
> test/TEST-04-SECCOMP/test.sh| 79
> +
> test/TEST-04-SECCOMP/will-fai
On 02/12/2014 09:21 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:12 PM, wrote:
> > From: Charles Rose
> >
> > Dell servers contain a virtual usb nic for systems management.
> > Name the device 'idrac' to easily identify it.
>
> The 75-net-description.rules is doe describe interfaces, n
Am 13.02.2014 00:14 schrieb "Kai Krakow" :
>
> Mirco Tischler schrieb:
>
> > It's late here so excuse me if I'm missing something. But wouldn't a
> > simple Before=sleep.target suffice to implement b)?
>
> I'm not sure... The unit is not enabled, only triggered by the timer - so
it
> may work. I t
Mirco Tischler schrieb:
> It's late here so excuse me if I'm missing something. But wouldn't a
> simple Before=sleep.target suffice to implement b)?
I'm not sure... The unit is not enabled, only triggered by the timer - so it
may work. I think I may try that as an alternative to systemd-inhibit
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek schrieb:
>> No, you need to wrap your command with it. I.e. instead of
>>
>> ExecStart=/path/to/backup-command ...
>>
>> you use
>>
>> ExecStart=/usr/bin/systemd-inhibit /path/to/backup-command ...
> Right. Not too bad, but Inhibits=sleep sounds nice.
I probably try t
The command line key-size is in bits but the libcryptsetup API expects bytes.
---
src/cryptsetup/cryptsetup.c |8 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/cryptsetup/cryptsetup.c b/src/cryptsetup/cryptsetup.c
index f72cf9f..e7e8066 100644
--- a/src/cryptsetup/
Add an (optional) "Id" key in the password agent .ask files. The Id is
supposed to be a simple string in ":" form which
is used to provide more information on what the requested passphrase
is to be used for (which e.g. allows an agent to only react to cryptsetup
requests).
---
src/ask-password/ask
Fix askpass overflow in reading a passphrase from a tty.
Doesn't seem security sensitive, but add a check for correctness.
---
src/shared/ask-password-api.c |5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/shared/ask-password-api.c b/src/shared/ask-password-api.c
index 1c18274..045c
The following series contains patch 1 - 3 of the previous patchset that
I've posted. Lennart wanted a single "Id=" instead of the two "Purpose="
and "Target=" strings in the .ask files, so I've changed it accordingly.
The two following patches are just small fixes.
I've left out the binary protoc
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:12:07PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> the major point of my critism is systemd-upstream's "release-and-forget"
> with no point releases at all and the state of systemd in F20 makes that
> not looking like a working strategy overstraining downstream maintainers
>
> tha
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> my tone is ok, if someone can't stand critism that's a different problem layer
Your tone is not ok.
This is a development mailing list and not a bitching or product
discussion channel. What you do is not appropriate or welcome here.
If t
Am 12.02.2014 22:41, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
> On 02/12/2014 07:37 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> these are all regressions from F19 to F20
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023820
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010572
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
On 02/12/2014 07:37 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
these are all regressions from F19 to F20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023820
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010572
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057811
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057618
h
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:45:50PM -0800, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > That's some downstream distro bug. And this is Fedora mailinglist.
> > RHEL issues are offtopic here.
>
> This is not a Fedora mailing list at all.
Ouch. I'm sor
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> That's some downstream distro bug. And this is Fedora mailinglist.
> RHEL issues are offtopic here.
This is not a Fedora mailing list at all.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
my last post for this topic before i get blocked again by
disturbing development in peace with real user problems
i thought so once per month it's woth to make notice
Am 12.02.2014 21:37, schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 08:05:47PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> https://bugzill
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 08:05:47PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047614
>
> Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
> Component:systemd (Show other bugs)
> Version: 7.0
That's some downstream distro bug. And this is Fedora mailinglist.
RHE
Am 12.02.2014 21:19, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> On Wed, 12.02.14 20:05, Reindl Harald ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047614
>>
>> Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
>> Component: systemd (Show other bugs)
>> Version: 7.0
>> Hardwar
On Wed, 12.02.14 20:05, Reindl Harald ([email protected]) wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047614
>
> Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
> Component:systemd (Show other bugs)
> Version: 7.0
> Hardware: Unspecified Unspecified
> Priority urgent Sev
Am 12.02.2014 20:18, schrieb Greg KH:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 08:05:47PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047614
>>
>> Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
>> Component: systemd (Show other bugs)
>> Version: 7.0
>> Hardware:Unspecified Uns
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 08:05:47PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047614
>
> Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
> Component:systemd (Show other bugs)
> Version: 7.0
> Hardware: Unspecified Unspecified
> Priority urgent Severity hi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047614
Product:Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Component: systemd (Show other bugs)
Version:7.0
Hardware: Unspecified Unspecified
Priorityurgent Severity high
first reported more than 3 months ago
https://bugzilla.redhat.c
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Elijah Newren wrote:
> At http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/InterfaceStabilityPromise
> (linked to from LWN just recently), the stable, almost-stable, and
> not-stable lists all run together in one long bulleted list making it
> appear that all categ
Hi,
At http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/InterfaceStabilityPromise
(linked to from LWN just recently), the stable, almost-stable, and
not-stable lists all run together in one long bulleted list making it
appear that all categories are part of the stability promise.
I suspect a newl
On Wed, 12.02.14 01:29, Ronny Chevalier ([email protected]) wrote:
Commited this one! Thanks!
(I added another commit on top, to add SystemCallErrorNumber= to
optionally return an error from blacklisted syscalls instead of aborting
the process)
> ---
> Ok so I found the problem. I forgot
---
test/TEST-04-SECCOMP/Makefile | 1 +
test/TEST-04-SECCOMP/test-seccomp.sh| 13 +
test/TEST-04-SECCOMP/test.sh| 79 +
test/TEST-04-SECCOMP/will-fail.service | 8 +++
test/TEST-04-SECCOMP/will-fail2.service | 6 +++
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:12 PM, wrote:
> From: Charles Rose
>
> Dell servers contain a virtual usb nic for systems management.
> Name the device 'idrac' to easily identify it.
The 75-net-description.rules is doe describe interfaces, not to carry
out any policy.
Product specific matches do not
El 11/02/14 09:12, Allmeroth, Robert escribió:
I helped myself to #ifdef the body of boot_timestamps() in
shared/boot_timestamp.c
Oh btw.. since you figured out before I did.. the next time please send
patches, it does not matter if they are wrong, ifdef is misplaced or
whatever.. just try!
From: Charles Rose
Dell servers contain a virtual usb nic for systems management.
Name the device 'idrac' to easily identify it.
---
rules/75-net-description.rules | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/rules/75-net-description.rules b/rules/75-net-description.rules
index 7e62f
On Wed, 12.02.14 11:28, Allmeroth, Robert ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I read a lot about the new cgroup concept of the kernel/systemd.
> I understand the logic behind it and why systemd wants to be the MCP of it.
> But I miss information how threads are handled.
>
> Example:
>
Hi,
I read a lot about the new cgroup concept of the kernel/systemd.
I understand the logic behind it and why systemd wants to be the MCP of it.
But I miss information how threads are handled.
Example:
Due to performance reasons we arrange components with various profiles into one
executable.
As
It is almost always incorrect to allow DHCP or other sources of
transient host names to override an explicitly configured static host
name.
This commit changes things so that if a static host name is set, this
will override the transient host name (eg: provided via DHCP). Transient
host names can
32 matches
Mail list logo
