On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Tony Seo wrote:
> But, I suspect that systemd has room not to get ACK from the server process
> executed by service unit.
> I concentrated on 3-way handshaking when I studied to analyze this problem.
>
> Isn't it right when we consider the systemd?
I'm not sure wha
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:09:56PM +0100, Warpme wrote:
> Kicking 'journalctl --unit mysqld.service' gives output of
> '/usr/bin/mysqld' but not '/usr/local/bin/mysqld-check.sh'
Can you show a record from journalctl -o verbose for mysqld-check.sh
(one of those not shown, just one is enough)?
Zbysz
Hi *
I have question regarding logging with help of systemd journal.
I have mysql daemon unit which so some housekeeping after daemon start
(see below).
My question is: what is best method to query journal to see _ALL_
execution output of mysqld.service unit?
Kicking 'journalctl --unit mysqld.s
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Peeters Simon wrote:
> recently I tried to switch my system to kdbus and systemd-bus-proxy.
> But the only dbus based daemon (except for systemd) which I care about
> (connman) seems to hang on startup, and connmanctl aborts with an
> error in libdbus-1 (dbus mess
In my case, "PartOf " is the most proper among your suggestions.
I wonder why "PartOf=.target" didn't work when I typed systemctl command.
Thanks.
2014/1/3 Mantas Mikulėnas
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Tony Seo wrote:
> > Hello.
> > I wonder that systemd has a method to stop all ser
Yeah, I got the process what you explain, thanks.
But, I suspect that systemd has room not to get ACK from the server process
executed by service unit.
I concentrated on 3-way handshaking when I studied to analyze this problem.
Isn't it right when we consider the systemd?
2014/1/1 David Timothy
hej,
recently I tried to switch my system to kdbus and systemd-bus-proxy.
But the only dbus based daemon (except for systemd) which I care about
(connman) seems to hang on startup, and connmanctl aborts with an
error in libdbus-1 (dbus message iterator is NULL)
the journal does not contain anythi
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> This adds support to generate a basic resolv.conf in /run/systemd/network.
> This file will not take any effect unless the admin makes a symlink from
> /etc/resolv.conf.
>
> The precedence of nameservers is:
>
> 1) nameservers receieved over
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/03/2014 12:35 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le vendredi 03 janvier 2014 à 11:48 -0500, Daniel J Walsh a écrit :
>> On 01/03/2014 09:16 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
>
>> Well thinking about this again, I think still to the single label. Lets
>> not
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:14:40AM -0800, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > 3. The strategy of dup()ing the socket doesn't work. I wrote
> >a simple server in python which logs the connections [2], and hooked
> >it up in
Hi again,
Im hopeing we can continue in-tree since its easier from here, and im unable to
get the time i want at the moment.
But i will ofcourse continue to help where i can when time permits.
I think the file nameing and locations are right?
Anyway heres what i got so far
---
Makefile.am
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> 3. The strategy of dup()ing the socket doesn't work. I wrote
>a simple server in python which logs the connections [2], and hooked
>it up into systemd [3-4] (*). If REUSEPORT was working correctly,
>each connection wo
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 12:50:23AM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi Djalal,
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> >> 1) nameservers receieved over DHCP
> >> 2) nameservers statically configured in a currently active .network file
> >> 3) nameservers statically configured
Le lundi 06 janvier 2014 à 03:20 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a
écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 05:22:42PM +0100, [email protected] wrote:
> > From: Michael Scherer
> >
> > ---
> > src/shared/apparmor-util.c | 15 +++
> > src/shared/apparmor-util.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 16
Hi, I used "ip netns" commands to setup several network namespaces.
Now I want to run a user-space (non-root) in one of those netspaces.
"ip netns exec NAME COMMAND" seems to only work for root, not normal
users.
Is there a way to configure a systemd unit to run in a *specific*
network namespace?
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Holger Winkelmann [TP]
wrote:
> just a small off topic question here. How far is IPv6 support in
> networks incl. DHCPv6?
So far we only support static IPv6.
-t
___
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
just a small off topic question here. How far is IPv6 support in
networks incl. DHCPv6?
Many thanks and a happy new year!
Holger
--
Holger Winkelmann
___
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mail
17 matches
Mail list logo
