On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2013 1:51 AM, "Tom Gundersen" wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> I have ne question: what happens if a sysctl set
On Dec 3, 2013 1:51 AM, "Tom Gundersen" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli
wrote:
> >
> >> I have ne question: what happens if a sysctl setting is in more than
> >> one file ? systemd-sysctl is smart enough to w
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli
> wrote:
>
>> I have ne question: what happens if a sysctl setting is in more than
>> one file ? systemd-sysctl is smart enough to write the last value or
>> perform several writes ?
>
> O
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> I have ne question: what happens if a sysctl setting is in more than
> one file ? systemd-sysctl is smart enough to write the last value or
> perform several writes ?
One write only, it logs at "info" level about overwritten values.
Hi Zbyszek
On 2013-12-02 23:27, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:27:45PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Yes am doing so. But IIRC the process order of the sysctl file was
>> inverted near systemd 207...
>>
>> Because Debian uses 204, when it switches to
Also install policykit-1 from experimental, which is built with logind support.
2013/12/2 Floris :
> Dear systemd maintainers,
>
> recently I upgraded Debian Testing to Gnome 3.8, but unfortunately gdm3.8
> is build without systemd support, so I installed gdm3.10 from experimental
> with his depen
SetProperties has signature "ba(sv)", but the bus_unit_set_properties()
helper already does a enter_container('a', "sv") so we have to skip it in
bus_unit_method_set_properties().
---
Heyho
I just stumbled over this. Don't have any test-case and it's too late here to be
100% sure about bus argume
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:27:45PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> On 2013-12-02 21:38, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 09:15:37PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> currently systemd contains a sysctl default setting in a file called
> >>
On 2013-12-02 21:32, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli
> wrote:
>> currently systemd contains a sysctl default setting in a file called
>> 50-default.conf
>> The aim of this patch is to split the content of the sysctl setting in
>> more files to allo
Dear systemd maintainers,
recently I upgraded Debian Testing to Gnome 3.8, but unfortunately gdm3.8
is build without systemd support, so I installed gdm3.10 from experimental
with his dependencies. (So basically I run Gnome 3.10)
gnome-shell --version
GNOME Shell 3.10.1
When I try to mount a dr
So people continue asking how to spawn a process in a new session from the
command-line. Turns out, it's not as easy as you might think. I stopped at
some point trying, but something like this should work:
systemd-run --description="Test" -- /bin/sh -- XDG_SEAT=seat0 XDG_VTNR=5 su -
david -- /so
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 09:15:37PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> currently systemd contains a sysctl default setting in a file called
> 50-default.conf
> The aim of this patch is to split the content of the sysctl setting in
> more files to allow a more selective override
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> currently systemd contains a sysctl default setting in a file called
> 50-default.conf
> The aim of this patch is to split the content of the sysctl setting in
> more files to allow a more selective override.
>
> My need is to en
Hi all,
currently systemd contains a sysctl default setting in a file called
50-default.conf
The aim of this patch is to split the content of the sysctl setting in
more files to allow a more selective override.
My need is to enable all the sysrq key. Instead systemd defaults is to
disallo
See systemd src/core/execute.c:1299-1312, especially lines 1300 and
1307.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
On Mon, 02.12.13 19:25, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> > I must say I really dislike mixing declarations and code. And I also
> > know that by accident I did this in many cases myself and was thankful
> > for the compiler to tell me about this.
>
> I never understood this
On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 14:37 +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
> But then gnome-session should simply call ReleaseSession() on the bus itself..
I'd rather have some sort of API where a particular process is the
"session leader", and its exit implies closing. Something like a pid
file in /run/systemd/s
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:58:40PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Sun, 01.12.13 01:26, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 02:45:21PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 02:39 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > >
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sat, 30.11.13 10:20, Shawn Landden (sh...@churchofgit.com) wrote:
>
>> nspawn has been called "chroot on steroids".
>>
>> Continue that tradition by supporting target directories that
>> are not root directories.
>>
>> This patch handl
On Sat, 16.11.13 19:41, Peeters Simon (peeters.si...@gmail.com) wrote:
> hello all,
>
> During the sd_bus porting I noted that the *ctl tools (and
> systemd-analyze) contain a lot of common boilerplate code.
>
> So the basic idea is to split this boilerplate out into
> xyzctl-common.[ch] so that
On Mon, 02.12.13 16:31, Lukasz Skalski (l.skal...@partner.samsung.com) wrote:
> Serial=4294967295 field in message dump generated by bus_message_dump()
> function for synthetic messages isn't good readable.
Thanks! Applied!
> ---
> src/libsystemd-bus/bus-dump.c | 12 +---
> 1 file chang
On Sun, 01.12.13 14:50, Shawn Landden (sh...@churchofgit.com) wrote:
> ---
> src/nspawn/nspawn.c | 19 +++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/nspawn/nspawn.c b/src/nspawn/nspawn.c
> index dd7337b..0151cf3 100644
> --- a/src/nspawn/nspawn.c
> +
On Sat, 30.11.13 10:20, Shawn Landden (sh...@churchofgit.com) wrote:
> nspawn has been called "chroot on steroids".
>
> Continue that tradition by supporting target directories that
> are not root directories.
>
> This patch handles the simple case: a static binary.
Hmm, I am not sure how I fee
On Sun, 01.12.13 00:38, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since 777d7a6123cbb192a8ff9e4ac5c05b1da84b4217 the build is broken on clang:
>
> src/libsystemd-bus/bus-control.c:686:41: error: fields must have a
> constant size: 'variable length array in structure' extension wil
On Sun, 01.12.13 10:13, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2013-12-01 at 01:26 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > Actually I don't think we need to totally forbid declarations after
> > statements.
>
> I don't have an opinion myself on making -Wdeclaration-after
On Sun, 01.12.13 01:26, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 02:45:21PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 02:39 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Thu, 28.11.13 00:54, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > (zbys...@kemper.freed
On Fri, 29.11.13 14:45, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 02:39 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Thu, 28.11.13 00:54, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > (zbys...@kemper.freedesktop.org) wrote:
>
> > Instead we should add some code to macro.h which turns off th
Hi
>> The binary file contains all glyphs in a compressed 1-bit-per-pixel format
>> for all 8x16 and 16x16 glyphs. It is linked directly into libsystemd-gfx
>> via the *.bin makefile target. Binary size is 2.1MB, but thanks to paging,
>> the kernel only loads required pages into memory. A ASCII-on
Serial=4294967295 field in message dump generated by bus_message_dump()
function for synthetic messages isn't good readable.
---
src/libsystemd-bus/bus-dump.c | 12 +---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/libsystemd-bus/bus-dump.c b/src/libsystemd-bus/bus-dum
that is the systemd-journald may ignore /dec/kmsg which are not a valid
device but a lint to /dev/null as done in LinuX Containers (LXC). This
change adds straight forward a check for /dev/kmsg.
Signed-off-by: Werner Fink
---
src/journal/journald-kmsg.c | 27 ++-
1 fil
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:48 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> If we want to interact with a user in the initrd, during
> emergency-situations, in single-user mode, or in any other rather limited
> situation, we currently rely on the kernel to do input and graphics access
> for us. More precisely, we r
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net]
> Sent: den 29 november 2013 13:49
> To: Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> Cc: David Timothy Strauss; systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Kay Sievers
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Thread level resource management
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Thu, 28.11.13 00:54, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> (zbys...@kemper.freedesktop.org) wrote:
>
>> commit f1a1264d13b31b9f5521f482d9a5a9d78da55efb
>> Author: Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek
>> Date: Thu Nov 28 03:41:33 2013 -0500
>>
>>
Hi
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Martin Pitt at 02/12/13 05:48 did gyre and gimble:
>>> > This way, screen will keep an "active" reference to the session and
>>> > systemd-logind will not mark it as "closing".
>>
>> But that screen process would still
Hi
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and David Herrmann at 01/12/13 11:43 did gyre and gimble:
>> During session_load() or if two sessions have the same VTnr, we may end up
>> with two sessions with the same position (this shouldn't happen, but lets
>> be fail
Hi
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Shawn Landden wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 3:43 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
>> logind has no concept of session ordering. Sessions have a unique name,
>> some attributes about the capabilities and that's already it. There is
>> currently no stable+total order
Hi
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:43 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
>> logind has no concept of session ordering. Sessions have a unique name,
>> some attributes about the capabilities and that's already it. There is
>> currently no stable+total order
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:43 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> logind has no concept of session ordering. Sessions have a unique name,
> some attributes about the capabilities and that's already it. There is
> currently no stable+total order on sessions. If we use the logind API to
> switch between sess
'Twas brillig, and Martin Pitt at 02/12/13 05:48 did gyre and gimble:
>> > This way, screen will keep an "active" reference to the session and
>> > systemd-logind will not mark it as "closing".
>
> But that screen process would still be running in the user's logind
> session cgroup, so logind can s
'Twas brillig, and David Herrmann at 01/12/13 11:43 did gyre and gimble:
> During session_load() or if two sessions have the same VTnr, we may end up
> with two sessions with the same position (this shouldn't happen, but lets
> be fail-safe in case some other part of the stack fails).
I presume t
40 matches
Mail list logo
