Re: [systemd-devel] Fwd: Journalctl performance

2013-10-12 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:31 AM, David Strauss wrote: > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote: >> Ouch 5s for a status is nasty. > > We regularly see this on our production systems. Yes, it's unfortunate. Yes, we are probably a lot to suffer of this. Today, 2mn for a status, 1m10s

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Smack enabled systems need /dev special devices correctly labeled

2013-10-12 Thread Demeter, Michael
Yes. Didn't think of it till I saw this.. Will resubmit this.. Michael On Oct 12, 2013 3:20 PM, "Kok, Auke-jan H" wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Michael Demeter > wrote: > > - Add AC_DEFINE for HAVE_SMACK to configure.ac > > - Add Check for smack in Makefile.am to include smack defa

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Smack enabled systems need /dev special devices correctly labeled

2013-10-12 Thread Kok, Auke-jan H
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Michael Demeter wrote: > - Add AC_DEFINE for HAVE_SMACK to configure.ac > - Add Check for smack in Makefile.am to include smack default rules > - Add smack default rules to label /dev/xxx correctly for access > > Change-Id: Iab07eb632b487b9ac4567cd08d0da6879709d44f

[systemd-devel] lirc package

2013-10-12 Thread Alec Leamas
Some day David Strauss wrote: On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Rave it wrote: A view in the spec file shows me that there is a lot of new things for me, ie. systemd. So i may need some assistents. Please feel free to email the systemd mailing list [1] or ask for help in our IRC channel, which