On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Linux Foundation is looking into it. Right now they don't have space, but they
> are trying to find something for us. We should know early/mid next week.
Any word on this?
--
David Strauss
| [email protected]
| +1 512 577 5827 [
On Fri, 30.08.13 17:22, Colin Guthrie ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> 'Twas brillig, and David Herrmann at 30/08/13 14:50 did gyre and gimble:
> > +subsystem = subsystem ? : "";
> > +
>
> zomg!!11eleven! This makes perfect sense but somehow this is the first
> time I've seen this synta
On Fri, 30.08.13 23:24, Paul D. DeRocco ([email protected]) wrote:
> I've got a Gumstix system that uses an LCD and a touchscreen, but without
> a desktop manager. I've created a service to load touchscreen cal data, or
> launch the calibrator program if it doesn't exist, but I can't figure o
On Tue, 03.09.13 20:32, Bartek Rekke ([email protected]) wrote:
Heya,
> I'am running Archlinux (recent version) including Systemd and Qemu.
>
> Since killing qemu directly is highly destructive for guest os I want to
> shut it gracefully. I think it is obvious nessesity To do so I decided to
>
On Tue, 10.09.13 02:30, Jan Engelhardt ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday 2013-09-10 02:20, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >On Sun, 08.09.13 14:29, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >>
> >> Speaking of which, systemctl would help debugging a lot better if it
> >> told the user what strange file it di
On Fri, 06.09.13 14:53, Robert Schiele ([email protected]) wrote:
> In some situations it is desirable to set the fsck fix level from "-a"
> to "-y". This for instance might be a reasonable decision on embedded
> systems where a user dealing with emergency mode is not available and
> we prefer t
On Fri, 06.09.13 14:26, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we should remove all recommendations to use -x for bug
> reports. Generic explanations are not useful one you know the bug
> messages, and those addtional like make the text much harder to read.
>
>
On Fri, 06.09.13 15:19, Ross Burton ([email protected]) wrote:
> If the administrator disables systemd-binfmt it can't be re-enabled correctly
> because there is no [Install] block, the symlinks to sysinit being created at
> install time manually. Add an Install block so that the those symlin
On Tuesday 2013-09-10 02:20, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>On Sun, 08.09.13 14:29, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>
>> Speaking of which, systemctl would help debugging a lot better if it
>> told the user what strange file it did not find.
>
>We are currently not good at generating nicely readable human D-B
On Mon, 09.09.13 17:23, MUNEDA Takahiro ([email protected]) wrote:
> Ok, I found out another problem.
> Even if I have a following udev rules and 'remove' event happens, no
> systemd service will be called.
>
> ACTION=="add|remove", TAG+="systemd", ENV{SYSTEMD_WANTS}="[email protected]
On Sun, 08.09.13 14:29, Jan Engelhardt ([email protected]) wrote:
> >Example Observation:
> >
> >[root@jimmy ~]# systemctl status mumble-server.service
> >mumble-server.service - LSB: Mumble VoIP Server
> > Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/mumble-server)
> > Active: inactive (dead)
> >
> >[root@
On Mon, 09.09.13 08:48, Colin Guthrie ([email protected]) wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Andrey Borzenkov at 08/09/13 11:27 did gyre and gimble:
> > В Sun, 08 Sep 2013 11:23:33 +0100
> > Colin Guthrie пишет:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I noticed from a user bug report that systemctl enable/disable on
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 09:25:07AM -0700, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> ---
> Makefile.am | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
> index fd38e82..5654ad3 100644
> --- a/Makefile.am
> +++ b/Makefile.am
> @@ -1708,6 +1708,7 @@ bin_PROGRAMS += \
> bootc
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 22:41:05 -0400,
MUNEDA Takahiro wrote:
> When an unit is called via udev rules like below, only first 'online'
> works correctly. Even if 'offline' event has happen, device and its
> relative data still exists inside systemd, then following online
> events will be ignored sin
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:23 PM, MUNEDA Takahiro
wrote:
> Ok, I found out another problem.
> Even if I have a following udev rules and 'remove' event happens, no
> systemd service will be called.
>
> ACTION=="add|remove", TAG+="systemd", ENV{SYSTEMD_WANTS}="[email protected]"
>
> My final goal is
Super Thanks!
That was what I've been looking for :)
2013/9/9 Lennart Poettering :
> On Mon, 09.09.13 09:28, Damian Ivanov ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I have the plugable multi seat station but would like to use it for
>> extending the desktop. Is there some variable at bo
On Mon, 09.09.13 09:28, Damian Ivanov ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have the plugable multi seat station but would like to use it for
> extending the desktop. Is there some variable at boot I can set, or
> some file I can edit, rather than manually attaching the device to
> se
'Twas brillig, and Andrey Borzenkov at 08/09/13 11:27 did gyre and gimble:
> В Sun, 08 Sep 2013 11:23:33 +0100
> Colin Guthrie пишет:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed from a user bug report that systemctl enable/disable on
>> sysvinit services (i.e. redirection to chkconfig) is broken.
>>
>> I can't see
Hi guys,
I have the plugable multi seat station but would like to use it for
extending the desktop. Is there some variable at boot I can set, or
some file I can edit, rather than manually attaching the device to
seat0?
Thanks in advance.
Damian
___
syst
19 matches
Mail list logo
