[systemd-devel] [PATCH 01/16] shell-completion: fix zsh completion installation

Moved zsh shell completion to shell-completion/zsh/_systemd for automake's sake. Also allow users to specify where the files should go with:: ./configure --with-zshcompletiondir=/path/to/some/where and by default going to `$datadir/zsh/site-functions` --- My server is down for maintenance, so

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 10/16] shell-comp: Split out zsh _systemd-nspawn

--- Makefile.am | 1 + shell-completion/zsh/_systemd| 26 +- shell-completion/zsh/_systemd-nspawn | 24 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) create mode 100644 shell-completion/zsh/_systemd-nspawn di

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 09/16] shell-comp: Split out zsh _udevadm

--- Makefile.am | 1 + shell-completion/zsh/_systemd | 142 +- shell-completion/zsh/_udevadm | 141 + 3 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-) create mode 100644 shell-completion/zsh/_u

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 08/16] shell-comp: Split out zsh _timedatectl

--- Makefile.am | 3 ++ shell-completion/zsh/_systemd | 67 +--- shell-completion/zsh/_timedatectl | 71 +++ 3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) create mode 100644 shell-completion/zsh/_t

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 07/16] shell-comp: Split out zsh _coredumpctl

--- Makefile.am | 3 +++ shell-completion/zsh/_systemd | 38 +-- shell-completion/zsh/_systemd-coredumpctl | 34 +++ 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) create mode 100644 shell-completio

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 06/16] shell-comp: Split out zsh _localectl

--- Makefile.am | 3 ++ shell-completion/zsh/_localectl | 89 + shell-completion/zsh/_systemd | 86 +-- 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) create mode 100644 shell-completion/zsh/_lo

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 05/16] shell-comp: Split out zsh _journalctl

Re-ordered some of the options and added a few that were missing previously as well. --- Makefile.am | 1 + shell-completion/zsh/_journalctl | 83 shell-completion/zsh/_systemd| 70 + 3 files changed

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 04/16] shell-comp: Split out zsh _hostnamectl

--- Makefile.am | 3 +++ shell-completion/zsh/_hostnamectl | 38 ++ shell-completion/zsh/_systemd | 34 +- 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) create mode 100644 shell-completion/zsh/_hos

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 03/16] shell-comp: Split out zsh _loginctl

--- Makefile.am| 3 ++ shell-completion/zsh/_loginctl | 112 + shell-completion/zsh/_systemd | 109 +-- 3 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-) create mode 100644 shell-completion/zsh/_

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 02/16] shell-comp: Split out zsh _systemctl

--- Makefile.am | 1 + shell-completion/zsh/_systemctl | 340 shell-completion/zsh/_systemd | 327 +- 3 files changed, 342 insertions(+), 326 deletions(-) create mode 100644 shell-completion/zsh/_

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 16/16] shell-comp: Split out zsh _systemd-tmpfiles

You can choose to have systemd-tmpfiles at configuration time, so only install the completion for this if configured to do so. --- Makefile.am| 3 +++ shell-completion/zsh/_systemd | 12 +--- shell-completion/zsh/_systemd-tmpfiles | 10 ++ 3 fi

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 15/16] shell-comp: Fix journalctl's --boot

Actually displays a list of boot ID's and offsets to the user --- shell-completion/zsh/_journalctl | 11 ++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/shell-completion/zsh/_journalctl b/shell-completion/zsh/_journalctl index 440e35d..4409fd7 100644 --- a/shell-completio

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 14/16] shell-comp: Remove unused functions

--- shell-completion/zsh/_systemd | 13 - 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/shell-completion/zsh/_systemd b/shell-completion/zsh/_systemd index 8eced09..1addfa5 100644 --- a/shell-completion/zsh/_systemd +++ b/shell-completion/zsh/_systemd @@ -102,19 +102,6 @@ _ctls()

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 13/16] shell-comp: Split out zsh _machinectl

--- Makefile.am | 3 +++ shell-completion/zsh/_machinectl | 47 ++ shell-completion/zsh/_systemd| 49 +--- 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) create mode 100644 shell-completion/zsh/_

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 12/16] shell-comp: Split out zsh _systemd-analyze

--- Makefile.am | 1 + shell-completion/zsh/_systemd | 28 +--- shell-completion/zsh/_systemd-analyze | 26 ++ 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) create mode 100644 shell-completion/zsh/_systemd-ana

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 11/16] shell-comp: Split out zsh _systemd-inhibit

--- Makefile.am | 3 ++- shell-completion/zsh/_systemd | 30 +- shell-completion/zsh/_systemd-inhibit | 27 +++ 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) create mode 100644 shell-completion/zsh/_system

[systemd-devel] [GIT PULL v3] Split out zsh completion into multiple files

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 05:10:34PM -0500, William Giokas wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:05:00AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > One of the main reasons why the bash completion was split into > > separate files named after the individual binary, is that > > bash-completion will load the complet

Re: [systemd-devel] Using busybox-udhcpc

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > I have a Yocto-based embedded system (poky-dylan on a Cedartrail Atom), > which has been modified to use systemd. I've also added Samba 3.6.8 from > OpenEmbedded. The system has available busybox-udhcpc for a DHCP client, but > nothing is s

[systemd-devel] Using busybox-udhcpc

I have a Yocto-based embedded system (poky-dylan on a Cedartrail Atom), which has been modified to use systemd. I've also added Samba 3.6.8 from OpenEmbedded. The system has available busybox-udhcpc for a DHCP client, but nothing is starting it. If I start it manually, then Samba works fine. I sup

Re: [systemd-devel] .automount from user?

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:02 PM, wrote: > Hello. I'm curious, and perhaps maybe lazy: is there any way to do automount > units from a user > systemd instance? I don't think this is possible given the security model around automount. Specifically, the automount needs to associate with a mount

Re: [systemd-devel] Create a new logind session from a systemd --user unit

On 30/07/13 00:02, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Also, D-Bus needs to look for the bus socket in $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR too. If you want this to happen ("you" in general, but especially Lennart who is a D-Bus reviewer), please review, test and/or "adopt"

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:46:22AM +0800, WANG Chao wrote: > On 07/31/13 at 12:32am, WANG Chao wrote: > > On 07/30/13 at 03:46pm, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:43:16AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > > > [CC harald] > > > > > > > > Not sure if this is right way

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 07:34:01PM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: >> 'Twas brillig, and Vivek Goyal at 30/07/13 15:26 did gyre and gimble: >> FYI, I don't see any CC's on the original mail as displayed on GMane via >> NNTP... > > I am CCed in orig

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 07:34:01PM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Vivek Goyal at 30/07/13 15:26 did gyre and gimble: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:05:08PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao wrote: > >>> If specified kernel command line rd

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

'Twas brillig, and Vivek Goyal at 30/07/13 15:26 did gyre and gimble: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:05:08PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao wrote: >>> If specified kernel command line rd.weak_sysroot, fstab-generate will >>> generate a weaker version of sys

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:46:22AM +0800, WANG Chao wrote: > On 07/31/13 at 12:32am, WANG Chao wrote: > > On 07/30/13 at 03:46pm, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:43:16AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > > > [CC harald] > > > > > > > > Not sure if this is right way

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/1] tests: skip test for test-unit-file when executed without privileges

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:17:30PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:50:54AM +0200, Christian Hesse wrote: > >> Hello everybody, > >> > >> for me this test fails and I think it is correct to skip it in c

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

On 07/31/13 at 12:32am, WANG Chao wrote: > On 07/30/13 at 03:46pm, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:43:16AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > > [CC harald] > > > > > > Not sure if this is right way to do or not but I will give more > > > background about the issue. > >

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

On 07/30/13 at 03:46pm, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:43:16AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > [CC harald] > > > > Not sure if this is right way to do or not but I will give more > > background about the issue. > > > > This assumption seems to be built into initramf

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

On 07/30/13 at 04:02pm, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:27 PM, WANG Chao wrote: > > On 07/30/13 at 02:05pm, Tom Gundersen wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao wrote: > >> > - It's not before initrd-root-fs.target. > > In case of kdump, 2nd kernel initrd is used

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

On 07/30/13 at 09:51am, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 07:53:11PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote: > > If specified kernel command line rd.weak_sysroot, fstab-generate will > > generate a weaker version of sysroot.mount: > > - It's not required by initrd-root-fs.target. > > - It's not before

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote: > On 07/30/2013 03:46 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> Maybe rootfsflags=nofail could do be used as this flag? > > rootfsflags=nofail sounds ok, if it is not used for booting the initial > system. Yeah, you are right, this looks like

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:02:17PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:27 PM, WANG Chao wrote: > > On 07/30/13 at 02:05pm, Tom Gundersen wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao wrote: > >> > - It's not before initrd-root-fs.target. > > In case of kdump, 2nd ker

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:05:08PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao wrote: > > If specified kernel command line rd.weak_sysroot, fstab-generate will > > generate a weaker version of sysroot.mount: > > - It's not required by initrd-root-fs.target. > > - It'

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:27 PM, WANG Chao wrote: >> On 07/30/13 at 02:05pm, Tom Gundersen wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao wrote: >>> > - It's not before initrd-root-fs.target. >> In case of kdump, 2nd kernel initrd i

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

On 07/30/2013 03:46 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:43:16AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: >> [CC harald] >> >> Not sure if this is right way to do or not but I will give more >> background about the issue. >> >> This assumption seems to be built into initramfs and sy

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:27 PM, WANG Chao wrote: > On 07/30/13 at 02:05pm, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao wrote: >> > - It's not before initrd-root-fs.target. > In case of kdump, 2nd kernel initrd is used to mount non-root local/remote > filesystem and dump v

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 07:53:11PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote: > If specified kernel command line rd.weak_sysroot, fstab-generate will > generate a weaker version of sysroot.mount: > - It's not required by initrd-root-fs.target. > - It's not before initrd-root-fs.target. > > So that failure in the w

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:43:16AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > [CC harald] > > Not sure if this is right way to do or not but I will give more > background about the issue. > > This assumption seems to be built into initramfs and systemd that root > should always be mountable. If one can't mount

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

[CC harald] Not sure if this is right way to do or not but I will give more background about the issue. This assumption seems to be built into initramfs and systemd that root should always be mountable. If one can't mount root, it is a fatal failure. But in case of kdump initramfs, this assumpti

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/1] tests: skip test for test-unit-file when executed without privileges

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:19:55PM +0200, Christian Hesse wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek on Tue, 2013/07/30 13:52: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:50:54AM +0200, Christian Hesse wrote: > > > Hello everybody, > > > > > > for me this test fails and I think it is correct to skip it in case > >

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

On 07/30/13 at 02:05pm, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao wrote: > > If specified kernel command line rd.weak_sysroot, fstab-generate will > > generate a weaker version of sysroot.mount: > > - It's not required by initrd-root-fs.target. > > - It's not before initr

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/1] tests: skip test for test-unit-file when executed without privileges

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek on Tue, 2013/07/30 13:52: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:50:54AM +0200, Christian Hesse wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > for me this test fails and I think it is correct to skip it in case > > permission is denied. Patch attached. > It *is* an error in the installatio

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/1] tests: skip test for test-unit-file when executed without privileges

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:50:54AM +0200, Christian Hesse wrote: >> Hello everybody, >> >> for me this test fails and I think it is correct to skip it in case >> permission is denied. Patch attached. > It *is* an error in the in

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao wrote: > If specified kernel command line rd.weak_sysroot, fstab-generate will > generate a weaker version of sysroot.mount: > - It's not required by initrd-root-fs.target. > - It's not before initrd-root-fs.target. > > So that failure in the weaker sys

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] fstab-generator: introduce rd.weak_sysroot to bypass failures in sysroot.mount

If specified kernel command line rd.weak_sysroot, fstab-generate will generate a weaker version of sysroot.mount: - It's not required by initrd-root-fs.target. - It's not before initrd-root-fs.target. So that failure in the weaker sysroot.mount will not fail initrd-root-fs.target. And systemd wi

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/1] tests: skip test for test-unit-file when executed without privileges

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:50:54AM +0200, Christian Hesse wrote: > Hello everybody, > > for me this test fails and I think it is correct to skip it in case > permission is denied. Patch attached. It *is* an error in the installation or environment if unit files cannot be read. In almost all circum

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/1] tests: skip test for test-unit-file when executed without privileges

Hello everybody, for me this test fails and I think it is correct to skip it in case permission is denied. Patch attached. -- main(a){char*c=/*Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH" "CX:;",b;for(a/*Chris get my mail address:*/=0;b=c[a++];) putchar(b-1/(/*