---
Makefile.am | 1 +
configure.ac | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 3ece887..f96866c 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -1832,6 +1832,7 @@ libsystemd_daemon_internal_la_SOURCES = \
$(libsystemd_daemon_la_SO
Hi,
so it seems to me, we use gettext to translate the PolicyKit policy
files, but we do not actually enable/ship them, as the po files are
not added to po/LINGUAS.
Admittedly, it's currently only a single translation (Polish), so I
was wondering what the intention here is. Do we want systemd to
On Sun, 21.07.13 18:14, Ramkumar Ramachandra ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> Kay Sievers wrote:
> > No, sorry, the same rule applies to C code as it does to unit files:
> > We do not collect specific exceptions for broken hacks in exotic
> > tools. Means: there will be _zero_ matches on UML strin
On Sat, 20.07.13 15:55, Ramkumar Ramachandra ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> Kay Sievers wrote:
> > I would rather see vconsole to detect the mess and silently give up,
> > instead of adding exotic options for really weird faked and wrong tty0
> > setups.
>
> um Linux lacks VT102 emulation, and
On Sat, 20.07.13 15:55, Ramkumar Ramachandra ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> Kay Sievers wrote:
> > I would rather see vconsole to detect the mess and silently give up,
> > instead of adding exotic options for really weird faked and wrong tty0
> > setups.
>
> um Linux lacks VT102 emulation, and
On Sun, 21.07.13 00:17, Ramkumar Ramachandra ([email protected]) wrote:
Heya,
> I noticed that my TERM is set to "linux", even when I boot the
> console-getty.service. Isn't it supposed to be "console" instead,
> since VT emulation is not guaranteed? Should we explicitly pass the
> term argume
On Sunday 2013-07-21 17:53, Kay Sievers wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
>> - disables the rules file entirely. Hwdb files must have the extension
>> + disables the rules file entirely. hwdb files must have the extension
>
>Hmm, you mean to start a senten
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
wrote:
>> Hacks like the UML tty0 hack is just a too broken idea, to
>> get any support or an exception in a generic tool like systemd.
>
> I think of it as less of a hack, and more of a deficiency. Nobody
> stayed up all night drinking coffe
Kay Sievers wrote:
> [...]
Fwiw, I more-or-less agree with the principle "don't accumulate
specific workarounds when it's not scalable or maintainable".
> Hacks like the UML tty0 hack is just a too broken idea, to
> get any support or an exception in a generic tool like systemd.
I think of it as
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 05:49:05PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >> > However, hwdb only contains vendor, product, class, subclass and
> >> > protocol. So if you drop usb.ids the rest o
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> - disables the rules file entirely. Hwdb files must have the extension
> + disables the rules file entirely. hwdb files must have the extension
Hmm, you mean to start a sentence with a lowercase word? Looks a bit unusual ...
Kay
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> > However, hwdb only contains vendor, product, class, subclass and
>> > protocol. So if you drop usb.ids the rest of the information will be
>> > lost.
>> >
>> > Maybe split the rest o
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 06:53:14AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> This includes regularly-submitted corrections to comma setting and
> orthographical mishaps that appeared in man/ in recent commits.
> ---
> man/crypttab.xml | 4 ++--
> man/journalctl.xml | 2 +-
> m
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > However, hwdb only contains vendor, product, class, subclass and
> > protocol. So if you drop usb.ids the rest of the information will be
> > lost.
> >
> > Maybe split the rest out into a separate file and ship only that?
> >
> > Or i
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:01:11PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > Can this mean I can drop the usb.ids file from the usbutils package? I
> > can't remember where hwdb is generated from, does it rely on the usb.ids
> > file for the initial creatio
Kay Sievers wrote:
> You meant to provide a patch against git, not your earlier patches?
Ofcourse; I was just asking if this is what you meant before
submitting another iteration for inclusion.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
wrote:
> Kay Sievers wrote:
>> Where do you see any "specific exceptions for broken hacks"?
>>
>> We surely support different forms of virtualizations, and support
>> reasonable custom behavior. But we do not support providing a tty0 and
>> hav
Kay Sievers wrote:
> Where do you see any "specific exceptions for broken hacks"?
>
> We surely support different forms of virtualizations, and support
> reasonable custom behavior. But we do not support providing a tty0 and
> have no working VT. It's just madness we don't want to see anywhere,
> a
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
wrote:
> Kay Sievers wrote:
>> No, sorry, the same rule applies to C code as it does to unit files:
>> We do not collect specific exceptions for broken hacks in exotic
>> tools. Means: there will be _zero_ matches on UML strings in systemd
>
>
Kay Sievers wrote:
> No, sorry, the same rule applies to C code as it does to unit files:
> We do not collect specific exceptions for broken hacks in exotic
> tools. Means: there will be _zero_ matches on UML strings in systemd
Um, then why do we have a detect-virt at all? A quick grep tells me
t
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
wrote:
> Kay Sievers wrote:
>>> If you're so particular about keeping primary unit files "clean", may
>>> I suggest moving the exception code to vconsole-setup.c?
>>
>> That's what I meant, yeah, sorry for the confusion.
>
> Cool, I understand
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>> Can this mean I can drop the usb.ids file from the usbutils package? I
>> can't remember where hwdb is generated from, does it rely on the usb.ids
>> file for the initial creation?
>
> hwd
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> Can this mean I can drop the usb.ids file from the usbutils package? I
> can't remember where hwdb is generated from, does it rely on the usb.ids
> file for the initial creation?
hwdb does not use the usb.ids from the usbutils package.
However,
23 matches
Mail list logo
