Re: [systemd-devel] Please proof-read: systemd’s dependencies and installation footprint

2013-06-10 Thread Kay Sievers
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Cristian Rodríguez wrote: > El 10/06/13 15:25, Kay Sievers escribió: > >> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Cristian Rodríguez >> wrote: >>> >>> El 10/06/13 06:17, Lennart Poettering escribió: >> >> Hmm, you list that our daemons would require pcre? That's wei

Re: [systemd-devel] Please proof-read: systemd’s dependencies and installation footprint

2013-06-10 Thread Cristian Rodríguez
El 10/06/13 15:25, Kay Sievers escribió: On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Cristian Rodríguez wrote: El 10/06/13 06:17, Lennart Poettering escribió: Hmm, you list that our daemons would require pcre? That's weird, we don't really do that. That sounds like a bug, Sounds more like something

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: make net_id more robust

2013-06-10 Thread Kay Sievers
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Sean McGovern wrote: > This is definitely not a common case as almost all of the other Linux > machines I have access to expose a network controller in domain 0. Yeah, I've only seen domains used on huge SGI machines. 256 PCI buses are quite a lot for a normal ma

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-shutdown static linking (was: Please proof-read: ...)

2013-06-10 Thread Ross Lagerwall
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 08:30:40PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > As root: halt > > > > I have attached the output of "systemctl show -- -.mount" and /etc/fstab > > and /proc/cmdline. > > > > I see that Conflicts=umount.target is set, though I have no idea why. > > > > I haven't changed to

Re: [systemd-devel] Please proof-read: systemd’s dependencies and installation footprint

2013-06-10 Thread Kay Sievers
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Cristian Rodríguez wrote: > El 10/06/13 06:17, Lennart Poettering escribió: >> Hmm, you list that our daemons would require pcre? That's weird, we >> don't really do that. That sounds like a bug, > Sounds more like something in the dependency chain is not linked

Re: [systemd-devel] Please proof-read: systemd’s dependencies and installation footprint

2013-06-10 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi Lennart, Thanks for your feedback. Lennart Poettering writes: > If Debian is interested in making systemd minimal, they could split out > logind and loginctl, since that is something you need that only for > systems where users or admins log into. For embedded devices it's > totally optional.

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-shutdown static linking (was: Please proof-read: ...)

2013-06-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 10.06.13 14:10, Ross Lagerwall ([email protected]) wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:33:01PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > This is really weird... (Though unrelated to systemd-shutdown, as this > > is generated before we execute it, replacing PID 1). > > > > -.mount is the

Re: [systemd-devel] Please proof-read: systemd’s dependencies and installation footprint

2013-06-10 Thread Cristian Rodríguez
El 10/06/13 06:17, Lennart Poettering escribió: Hmm, you list that our daemons would require pcre? That's weird, we don't really do that. That sounds like a bug, Sounds more like something in the dependency chain is not linked with as-needed causing a mess.

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 00/18] journal fixes and enhancements, please review

2013-06-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:50:11AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sat, 08.06.13 00:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote: > > > Hi, > > this is a small series with journal cleanups, enhancements, > > and bugfixes: > > > > Patches marked with (*) are the ones worth looki

Re: [systemd-devel] [RFC PATCH] logs-show: print multiline messages

2013-06-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:57:43PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sun, 09.06.13 19:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 11:43:38AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Fri, 03.05.13 19:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-shutdown static linking (was: Please proof-read: ...)

2013-06-10 Thread Ross Lagerwall
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:33:01PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > This is really weird... (Though unrelated to systemd-shutdown, as this > is generated before we execute it, replacing PID 1). > > -.mount is the mount unit is something we do not try to unmount at > shutdown from normal systemd,

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH v3] journalctl: Add support for showing messages from a previous boot

2013-06-10 Thread Jan Janssen
On 06/10/2013 12:15 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 02:32:35PM +0200, Jan Janssen wrote: --b ---this-boot - -Show data only from -

Re: [systemd-devel] [RFC PATCH] logs-show: print multiline messages

2013-06-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 09.06.13 19:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 11:43:38AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Fri, 03.05.13 19:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) > > wrote: > > > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 06:51:35PM +0200, L

Re: [systemd-devel] Patch to show systemd & generators

2013-06-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 07.06.13 21:31, Thomas H.P. Andersen ([email protected]) wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > On Tue, 14.05.13 08:59, Thomas H.P. Andersen ([email protected]) wrote: > > > >> >> Would you be interested in a patch that shows "Systemd + Generators" or >

Re: [systemd-devel] Automount behavior

2013-06-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 09.06.13 19:59, Mickaël THOMAS ([email protected]) wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying to achieve automatic mounting of my external hard drive > whenever it's plugged in. > > I first tried the x-systemd.automount option in /etc/fstab but that > led to problems when the disk is not plugged (KD

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-shutdown static linking (was: Please proof-read: ...)

2013-06-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 09.06.13 17:11, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote: > > And if I run "pacman -S glibc" and then shutdown: > > -.mount mount process exited, code=exited status=32 > > -.mount changed unmounting -> mounted > > Job -.mount/stop finished, result=failed > > Failed unmounting

Re: [systemd-devel] Please proof-read: systemd’s dependencies and installation footprint

2013-06-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 08.06.13 15:14, Michael Stapelberg ([email protected]) wrote: > Hi, Heya! > I intend to publish a document about systemd’s dependencies and > installation footprint (along with a blog article) to a wider scope soon > and would like to make sure I don’t publish anything which is plain

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCHv2] Allow for the use of @ in remote host calls

2013-06-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 10.06.13 00:28, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 03:54:39PM -0500, Daniel Wallace wrote: > > Without this you have to use %40 with the -H flag because dbus doesn't > > like the @ sign being unescaped. > Applied. Umm, I am pretty sure we s

Re: [systemd-devel] Tuning A/V at Boot

2013-06-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 08.06.13 22:00, Kok, Auke-jan H ([email protected]) wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 5:43 PM, wrote: > > Where in boot sequence tune A/V latency? Is sound.target relevant? > > anything device specific should be triggered from a udev rule, so that > you're not running this servi

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 00/18] journal fixes and enhancements, please review

2013-06-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 08.06.13 00:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote: > Hi, > this is a small series with journal cleanups, enhancements, > and bugfixes: > > Patches marked with (*) are the ones worth looking at. > The last one is (hopefully) a fix for the production of > journals which

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 11/17] journal: add sd_journal_open_files

2013-06-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 08.06.13 00:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote: > This allows the caller to explicitly specify which journal files > should be opened. The same functionality could be achieved before > by creating a directory and playing around with symlinks. It > is useful to debug

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 09/17] journalctl: print monotonic timestamp in --header

2013-06-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 08.06.13 00:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote: > --- > src/journal/journal-file.c| 6 -- > src/journal/journald-server.c | 19 +++ > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/journal/journal-file.c b/src/journa

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 08/17] journalctl: print proper IDs with --header

2013-06-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 08.06.13 00:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote: > + sd_id128_to_string(f->header->file_id, alloca(33)), > + sd_id128_to_string(f->header->machine_id, alloca(33)), > + sd_id128_to_string(f->header->boot_id, alloca(33)), > +

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 02/17] journal: add ability to filter by current user

2013-06-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 08.06.13 00:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote: > This is the just the library part. > > SD_JOURNAL_CURRENT_USER flags is added to sd_j_open(), to open > files from current user. > > SD_JOURNAL_SYSTEM_ONLY is renamed to SD_JOURNAL_SYSTEM, > and changed to mean to (