[systemd-devel] [PATCH] logind-multi-seat issues

2012-12-14 Thread Oleg Samarin
i1. Capability of making seats without framebuffer devices logind.c: The seat is now activated by any device with udev tag "seat-master" 71-seat.rules.in: All framebuffer devices have this tag multi-seat-x.c: if the seat does not have a framebuffer device, runs X as a proxy, adding -sha

Re: [systemd-devel] [RFC] iscsid / systemd / dracut integration effort

2012-12-14 Thread Mike Christie
On 12/10/2012 04:08 PM, Chris Leech wrote: > Sorry about the cross-posting, but I think that in order to get this right I'm > going to need as much feedback as I can get. > > I think I've got this working pretty well now (at least for my iBFT configured > iSCSI root test case), although the dracut

Re: [systemd-devel] udev device mapper rules for early boot?

2012-12-14 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On 12/13/2012 06:58 PM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > В Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:35:11 -0800 > Nikolaus Rath пишет: > >> On 12/13/2012 08:35 AM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: >> >> Now, I could add the missing rule and program to the initrd, but I feel >> this is really opening a can of worms, since I don't real

Re: [systemd-devel] Counting mechanism in udev rules

2012-12-14 Thread Kay Sievers
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Robert Milasan wrote: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:30:05 +0100 > "Kay Sievers" wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Robert Milasan >> wrote: >> > Is there some kind of a counting mechanism which can be used in a >> > udev rule? >> > >> > I got this rule: >> >

Re: [systemd-devel] Counting mechanism in udev rules

2012-12-14 Thread Robert Milasan
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:30:05 +0100 "Kay Sievers" wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Robert Milasan > wrote: > > Is there some kind of a counting mechanism which can be used in a > > udev rule? > > > > I got this rule: > > > > ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="3270", KERNEL=="tty0.0.[0-9]*", > >

Re: [systemd-devel] daemon migration tutorial

2012-12-14 Thread Kay Sievers
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Dennis Semakin at 14/12/12 08:15 did gyre and gimble: >> I just want to ask you a question about daemon migration to systemd. >> I have daemon source code, I want to use it with systemd. Where can I find >> the informati

Re: [systemd-devel] Counting mechanism in udev rules

2012-12-14 Thread Kay Sievers
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Robert Milasan wrote: > Is there some kind of a counting mechanism which can be used in a udev > rule? > > I got this rule: > > ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="3270", KERNEL=="tty0.0.[0-9]*", > SYMLINK+="3270/ttycons-%n" > > and the result of this rule looks like this:

Re: [systemd-devel] udev device mapper rules for early boot?

2012-12-14 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Andrey Borzenkov at 14/12/12 02:58 did gyre and gimble: > В Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:35:11 -0800 > Nikolaus Rath пишет: > >> On 12/13/2012 08:35 AM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: >> >> Now, I could add the missing rule and program to the initrd, but I feel >> this is really opening a can

Re: [systemd-devel] daemon migration tutorial

2012-12-14 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Dennis Semakin at 14/12/12 08:15 did gyre and gimble: > Hello, > > I just want to ask you a question about daemon migration to systemd. > I have daemon source code, I want to use it with systemd. Where can I find > the information about this? > Is there any centralized tutorial

[systemd-devel] daemon migration tutorial

2012-12-14 Thread Dennis Semakin
Hello, I just want to ask you a question about daemon migration to systemd. I have daemon source code, I want to use it with systemd. Where can I find the information about this? Is there any centralized tutorial or document which contains the clear description of how to redesign daemon source c

[systemd-devel] Counting mechanism in udev rules

2012-12-14 Thread Robert Milasan
Is there some kind of a counting mechanism which can be used in a udev rule? I got this rule: ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="3270", KERNEL=="tty0.0.[0-9]*", SYMLINK+="3270/ttycons-%n" and the result of this rule looks like this: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Dec 13 15:28 ttycons-0500 -> ../tty0.0.0500