[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add libsystemd-id128-internal.la as link time dependency for test-engine and test_job_type

2012-09-07 Thread Khem Raj
Fixes linking errors like src/core/condition.c:207: undefined reference to `sd_id128_get_machine' Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- Makefile.am |6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am index 7ccec67..304a990 100644 --- a/Makefile.am +++ b/M

[systemd-devel] systemd-inhibit --list doesn't work

2012-09-07 Thread Matthias Clasen
See attached patch 0001-Make-systemd-inhibit-list-work.patch Description: Binary data ___ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd intentional behaviour? (signals)

2012-09-07 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 07.09.12 12:52, Alex Elsayed ([email protected]) wrote: > > Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > If we are crashed we are crashed. > > > > I looked into reexecing systemd in this case, but unfortunately the > > kernel does not allow reexecing of PID 1 after it crashed. Not entire

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd intentional behaviour? (signals)

2012-09-07 Thread Alex Elsayed
Lennart Poettering wrote: > > If we are crashed we are crashed. > > I looked into reexecing systemd in this case, but unfortunately the > kernel does not allow reexecing of PID 1 after it crashed. Not entirely > sure what's going on there. But even if that worked I am not sure this > would be too

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd intentional behaviour? (signals)

2012-09-07 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 07.09.12 15:15, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ([email protected]) wrote: > >>Is this intentional? There is a way to restore systemd again without > >>a forced reboot? > >Yes, this is intentional. If we crash (or the user kills us) we print a > >warning and freeze. If the user kills us again

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd intentional behaviour? (signals)

2012-09-07 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
On 09/07/2012 01:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fri, 24.08.12 00:54, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ([email protected]) wrote: Hello Just for fun I am sending some signals to systemd (188) to see how reacts compared to sysvinit. While sysvinit ignores them or restores from "crash" after 30

[systemd-devel] Journald Scalability

2012-09-07 Thread Holger Winkelmann
Hi, We are just wondering how scalable the journal will be on a single host. This means in terms of number of journal files and the maintenance of the index to query the journal. Think of a server with a lot of syslog activities. Many thnaks, Holger -- Holger Winkelmann email: h...@travelping.

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd intentional behaviour? (signals)

2012-09-07 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 24.08.12 00:54, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ([email protected]) wrote: > Hello > > Just for fun I am sending some signals to systemd (188) to see how > reacts compared to sysvinit. While sysvinit ignores them or restores > from "crash" after 30 seconds of sleep, systemd/journald just log

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd hackfest on Developer Conference 2013

2012-09-07 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 07.09.12 10:08, Václav Pavlín ([email protected]) wrote: Heya, > I've created event on Google+ for the systemd Hackfest before Developer > Conference 2013. > > At the time it is planned for two days (Thursday and Friday - February > 21. and 22.) - let me know if it is ok for you, or you

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd hackfest on Developer Conference 2013

2012-09-07 Thread Václav Pavlín
Hi, I've created event on Google+ for the systemd Hackfest before Developer Conference 2013. At the time it is planned for two days (Thursday and Friday - February 21. and 22.) - let me know if it is ok for you, or you want it only for one day. https://plus.google.com/events/cnklef88b85tb6tgf6u