Re: [systemd-devel] Bug in systemd? Running X without a display manager

2012-08-26 Thread Dave Reisner
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:17:08PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > I need some help with a problem. > > I'm currently using Fedora 16, but without a display manager. I log > into a text-mode VT (usually tty1) and run startx manually. The > display uses tty7 and works fine. > > But systemd isn't awar

[systemd-devel] Bug in systemd? Running X without a display manager

2012-08-26 Thread Alan Stern
I need some help with a problem. I'm currently using Fedora 16, but without a display manager. I log into a text-mode VT (usually tty1) and run startx manually. The display uses tty7 and works fine. But systemd isn't aware of it, or at least, isn't aware that my login session now owns tty7. F

Re: [systemd-devel] udev 182: response timeout for request_firmware in module_probe path

2012-08-26 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 17:46 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > IMO, the driver probing path is allowed to sleep, so looks request > firmware > > should be allowed inside .probe(). > > I'm not convinced about that. It can sleep but its holding various > locks > in most cases, and it looks like that can end

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] shutdown: do reboot() for openvz container

2012-08-26 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
Proper handling of reboot() syscall issued from the inside of a container was always supported by OpenVZ kernels. More to say, OpenVZ relies on the fact that container calls reboot in order to distinguish between shutdown and reboot-- in the latter case container is being restarted. This patch bri

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] shutdown: do reboot() for openvz container

2012-08-26 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
From: Kir Kolyshkin Proper handling of reboot() syscall issued from the inside of a container was always supported by OpenVZ kernels. More to say, OpenVZ relies on the fact that container calls reboot in order to distinguish between shutdown and reboot-- in the latter case container is being rest