On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 18:38 +0200, Marius Tolzmann wrote:
> ---
> src/core/main.c |4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/core/main.c b/src/core/main.c
> index cdd77c1..8973637 100644
> --- a/src/core/main.c
> +++ b/src/core/main.c
> @@ -1511,8 +1511,
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 18:38 +0200, Marius Tolzmann wrote:
> ---
> src/core/main.c |4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/core/main.c b/src/core/main.c
> index cdd77c1..8973637 100644
> --- a/src/core/main.c
> +++ b/src/core/main.c
> @@ -1511,8 +1511,
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 18:38 +0200, Marius Tolzmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just hit some possible wrong error messages. Since prctl() is a
> system call it won't return -errno but just -1 and set errno to some value.
>
> The attached patch should fix those error messages, if, for example,
> PR_SET_
On Thu, 16.08.12 16:27, Robin Becker ([email protected]) wrote:
> However, I'm a bit lost on what's the correct way for a user program
> to signal that it wants to shut down etc. Slim appears to be running
> polkit/consolekit so presumably I can use that, but is there a
> preferred systemd appro
config_parse_join_controllers() not converted cause that is a const char *
---
src/core/main.c | 38 --
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/core/main.c b/src/core/main.c
index cdd77c1..528cfec 100644
--- a/src/core/main.c
+++ b/
---
src/core/main.c | 52 ++--
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/core/main.c b/src/core/main.c
index cdd77c1..4e12793 100644
--- a/src/core/main.c
+++ b/src/core/main.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int set_default_un
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 11:58 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Shawn Landden at 16/08/12 02:13 did gyre and gimble:
> > ---
> > src/core/main.c | 51 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src
---
src/core/main.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/core/main.c b/src/core/main.c
index cdd77c1..8973637 100644
--- a/src/core/main.c
+++ b/src/core/main.c
@@ -1511,8 +1511,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
/* Become reaper of
Hi,
I just hit some possible wrong error messages. Since prctl() is a
system call it won't return -errno but just -1 and set errno to some value.
The attached patch should fix those error messages, if, for example,
PR_SET_CHILD_REAPER is
not yet implemented due to an older kernel.
BTW the REQ
I don't get this. This "oblogout" thing is a graphical tool you spawn
from the system level? Does that mean it runs privileged but accesses
your unprivileged X session? That sounds wrong...
If you have a graphical session then the graphical session should handle
the power/sleep key
On Thu, 16.08.12 13:16, Robin Becker ([email protected]) wrote:
> On 16/08/2012 12:47, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Robin Becker wrote:
>
> >
> >It'd be a bit better if the button/lid events were handled by a
> >program running inside the Openbox session
On Thu, 16.08.12 14:47, Mantas Mikulėnas ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Robin Becker wrote:
> > However, on my netbooks I like to use the power button to launch oblogout
> > which brings up a bunch of buttons that allow me to
> > logout/suspend/restart/halt etc etc.
On Thu, 16.08.12 12:23, Robin Becker ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I liked the idea of systemd when I first saw it, but after doing a
> few conversions I have some small issues. I run arch linux with slim
> & openbox and that seems to be fully supported so far as I can tell.
>
> However
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:33:29 +0300
Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> > Hello All.
> > I'm trying to write a systemd service for epmd (Erlang Port Mapper
> > Daemon, if someone is curious). its only purpose is to open a TCP port
> > 4369 at 0.
...
Openbox is actually running as a user process so it has no greater rights
than the user; that makes the use of a more capable daemon a bit more
reasonable.
No, if your action just runs `oblogout` (and possibly `systemctl
suspend`), then the capabilities of a normal user are sufficient
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All.
> I'm trying to write a systemd service for epmd (Erlang Port Mapper
> Daemon, if someone is curious). its only purpose is to open a TCP port
> 4369 at 0.0.0.0 and act as a simple messaging (very simple actually)
> bus between erl
On 16/08/2012 12:47, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Robin Becker wrote:
It'd be a bit better if the button/lid events were handled by a
program running inside the Openbox session (the events can be read
from /run/acpid.socket).
I'm not exactly sure here, bu
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Robin Becker wrote:
> However, on my netbooks I like to use the power button to launch oblogout
> which brings up a bunch of buttons that allow me to
> logout/suspend/restart/halt etc etc. I can of course continue to use acpid
> to handle the power button, but that
Hi,
I liked the idea of systemd when I first saw it, but after doing a few
conversions I have some small issues. I run arch linux with slim & openbox and
that seems to be fully supported so far as I can tell.
However, on my netbooks I like to use the power button to launch oblogout which
bri
'Twas brillig, and Shawn Landden at 16/08/12 02:13 did gyre and gimble:
> ---
> src/core/main.c | 51 ++-
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/core/main.c b/src/core/main.c
> index cdd77c1..e9b656b 100644
> ---
20 matches
Mail list logo
