The PAM helper thread needs to capture the death signal from the
parent, but is prohibited from doing so since when the child dies
as normal user, the kernel won't allow it to send a TERM to the
PAM helper thread which is running as root.
This causes the PAM threads to never exit, accumulating aft
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:28 PM, g4hx wrote:
> On 05/17/2012 08:19 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> There should be no need to use .mount units, just continue using
>> /etc/fstab as before.
>
> Well, I have tried doing that, but if I don't use .mount files with
> correct dependencies, the device files
]] Michael Biebl
> We've seen this quite often on Debian, too, due to sysv init scripts
> doing "interesting" stuff, like being both started in rcS.d and rc2.d.
This should have been fixed in e51db373c242b7541794affb2b5e411bcce26d0f.
More logic to handle non-sensical cases would be good. We sho
On 05/17/2012 08:19 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:54 PM, g4hx wrote:
>> How do I include lvm2 based partitions in a technically clean and
>> correct way?
>
> The situation is not ideal for lvm on systemd, but enabling
> lvm.service (from arch-systemd-units) should
Hi,
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:54 PM, g4hx wrote:
> How do I include lvm2 based partitions in a technically clean and
> correct way?
The situation is not ideal for lvm on systemd, but enabling
lvm.service (from arch-systemd-units) should work for a basic setup
where lvm is at the bottom of your s
Hello all,
I have been using systemd for a while now, and I have to say that I am
quite impressed by the noticeable speed up during boot. However, I have
some question about systemd that are yet unanswered. I did not find the
reuqired information elsewhere, so now I am asking directly:
How do I i
2012/5/17 Kay Sievers :
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> I know this has been discussed a lot but it's still showing up for me on
>> occasion, especially with 3rd party non-LSB init scripts.
>>
>> My suggestion would be to prioritise the jobs that we delete... can we
>> t
'Twas brillig, and Kay Sievers at 17/05/12 15:18 did gyre and gimble:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> I know this has been discussed a lot but it's still showing up for me on
>> occasion, especially with 3rd party non-LSB init scripts.
>>
>> My suggestion would be to pri
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> I know this has been discussed a lot but it's still showing up for me on
> occasion, especially with 3rd party non-LSB init scripts.
>
> My suggestion would be to prioritise the jobs that we delete... can we
> tell that a job relates to a uni
I know this has been discussed a lot but it's still showing up for me on
occasion, especially with 3rd party non-LSB init scripts.
My suggestion would be to prioritise the jobs that we delete... can we
tell that a job relates to a unit? And if so can we tell if a unit is
sysv, lsb or native? If so
10 matches
Mail list logo
