[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Clarify man page with respect to automatic fstab dependencies.

2012-02-03 Thread Bill Nottingham
Automatic mounts will be added if 'MountAuto=yes' is in system.conf, regardless of whether comment=systemd.mount is set. Signed-off-by: Bill Nottingham --- man/systemd.mount.xml |7 --- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/man/systemd.mount.xml b/man/systemd.mou

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/3] set WATCHDOG_USEC environmen variable

2012-02-03 Thread Michael Olbrich
--- src/service.c |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/service.c b/src/service.c index f030ccf..9bd3332 100644 --- a/src/service.c +++ b/src/service.c @@ -1726,6 +1726,12 @@ static int service_spawn( goto fail;

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/3] more watchdog patches

2012-02-03 Thread Michael Olbrich
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 07:42:46PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > b) hook up the watchdog with the existing failure logic and introduce > WatchdogSec for that. This is the first patch. It works, but I'm not sure about the implementation. I tried to use the existing Watch. However, as far as I

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/3] introduce WatchdogSec and hook up the watchdog with the existing failure logic

2012-02-03 Thread Michael Olbrich
--- man/systemd.service.xml | 17 + src/dbus-service.c |2 ++ src/load-fragment-gperf.gperf.m4 |1 + src/service.c| 30 ++ src/service.h|3 +++ 5 files changed, 53 insertions(

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 3/3] WIP: service: add StartLimitInterval/StartLimitBurst/StartLimitAction

2012-02-03 Thread Michael Olbrich
Signed-off-by: Michael Olbrich --- src/dbus-service.c |7 +++ src/load-fragment-gperf.gperf.m4 |3 +++ src/load-fragment.c |1 + src/load-fragment.h |1 + src/service.c| 14 +- src/service.h

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] rpcbind: add support for systemd socket activation

2012-02-03 Thread Chuck Lever
Hi- On Feb 1, 2012, at 11:37 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > Hi Chuck, > > Thanks for the feedback. > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: >> Typically this is done by breaking the proposed change into smaller atomic >> patches. Is that not possible in this case? > > Not entirely

Re: [systemd-devel] [Libtirpc-devel] [PATCH] rpcbind: add support for systemd socket activation

2012-02-03 Thread Ian Kent
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 17:37 +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: > Hi Chuck, > > Thanks for the feedback. > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: > > Typically this is done by breaking the proposed change into smaller atomic > > patches. Is that not possible in this case? > > Not entire

[systemd-devel] systemd39: journald segfault brings down some user services

2012-02-03 Thread warpme
Hi, I have question related to latest systemd39 & newly introduced journald. I'm on ArchLinux (kernel 3.0.18). Recently - after upgrade from systemd37->39 I'm observing decreased system stability. It manifests as random services outages. So far during last days I had 2 such cases. In both of t