I resend some of this because I think it is inportant,
and for some reason it didn't make it to the list.
> > The change shown is not bad, but I might say something like
> "... other
> > than the Stop command being issued..."
> There are other reasons why a unit can be stopped: if the unit
> Requ
at all
> 4) ExecStartPre=/bin/false
> 5) ... OK, this is rapidly becoming silly
>
> What exactly are you trying to accomplish? Are you intending
> the enable-prevention to be done at the package level or the
> administrator level?
>
> Bill
>
> __ NOD32 (2
Michael D. Berger ([email protected]) said:
> Is there a way to prevent a service from being enabled?
1) Don't have an '[Install]' section in the unit file
2) Mask the service (ln -s /dev/null /etc/systemd/system/.service)
3) Don't install the service file/service binary at all
4) ExecStartPre=
Hi,
I'm running a Java JVM service using:
ExecStart=/usr/bin/java -jar foo.jar
When I stop the service with systemctl, it goes into the failed state
because the JVM exits with status 143 instead of 0.
There doesn't seem to be any way to get a JVM to exit(0) on SIGTERM. You
can run code on t
> -Original Message-
> From: Zbigniew Jedrzejewski-Szmek [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 04:38
> To: Michael D. Berger
> Cc: [email protected]; 'Reindl Harald'
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] F16_64: attempt at OpenVPN
> server service file
>
Le samedi 26 novembre 2011 à 22:52 +0100, Stefan Majewsky a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> my openSUSE 12.1 system boots in about 30 seconds, and I wanted to cut
> that time down a bit, so I took a look at systemd-analyze's blame and
> plot output.
>
> But I do not really know how to interpret the results whi
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> There is not that much of the crazy stuff left. And if the filesystem
> is not on LVM or BIOS raid, most of these packages can be removed.
In fact, I've masked lvm.service (=/etc/init.d/boot.lvm) because I
don't have LVM and lvm.service looked
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> I'd check a fresh install to avoid problem with legacy udev rules...
The system was reinstalled when I went to openSUSE 12.1 RC 1 (or Beta
2, don't exactly remember). Since then, I've only updated.
Greetings
Stefan
__
Michael,
Thanks for reply.
I am using kernel version 2.6.38 and after objdump, I could see the code for
accept4 in libc as well.
But still problem persists.
Regards,
Devendra
-Original Message-
From:
systemd-devel-bounces+devendra.talegaonkar=kpitcummins@lists.freedesktop.org
[m
On 11/27/2011 11:30 PM, Michael D. Berger wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Zbigniew Jedrzejewski-Szmek [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 14:12
To: [email protected]
Cc: Michael D. Berger; 'Reindl Harald'
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] F16_64: atte
10 matches
Mail list logo