Older GNU C libraries don't define RLIMIT_RTTIME, so including the
missing.h is required to fix the build.
---
src/load-fragment-gperf.gperf.m4 |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/load-fragment-gperf.gperf.m4 b/src/load-fragment-gperf.gperf.m4
index 650f444
Hi there
We developt an own rc script a while ago for maintaining our tomcats. (mainly
improved shutdown behaviour with eventual kill).
The script takes start/Stopp/status as arguments, and identifies the right PID
by a filtered 'ps'. It also keeps track of the tomcats pid in an own pid-file.
Heya,
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/systemd-33.tar.bz2
Mostly optimizations and bug fixes, but some minor new features, such as
the nifty PrivateNetwork= service setting, which allows you to shut off
networking for a specific service (i.e. all routable network interfaces
will disapp
Hi,
See the attached patch.
Thanks.
From da6a563f9e44dc032ac94bdb1e1c71dc77ed6f92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miklos Vajna
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 23:58:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] build-sys: Add --disable-timedated configure switch
---
Makefile.am | 52 ++
On 08/02/2011 03:17 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 08/02/2011 07:11 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
>> t doesn't make much sense for me to run nfsd, mountd, rquotad and everything
>> from a single .service unit - after all, they are separate services with
>> their own protocols... I might
2011/8/2 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> On 08/02/2011 07:11 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
>>
>> t doesn't make much sense for me to run nfsd, mountd, rquotad and
>> everything from a single .service unit - after all, they are separate
>> services with their own protocols... I might want to just restart
On 08/02/2011 07:11 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
t doesn't make much sense for me to run nfsd, mountd, rquotad and everything
from a single .service unit - after all, they are separate services with their
own protocols... I might want to just restart rpc.idmapd without killing the
rest of NFS.
(Apparently, I've still yet to learn the difference between "Reply" and "Reply
to List". Bleh. Disregard duplicates.)
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:36:49AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> [...]
> So the nfs-server.service looks like:
>
> [Unit]
> Description=NFS Protocol Daemon
> After=network.target
hi..
since conditions specifying wheter a service should start are somehow
limited to the existence of some files/directories/etc. i was searching
for something more complex to handle conditional service starts.
is there a way to execute a program and take its exit status to evaluate
the co
Hi,
I would like to do network statistics per application. That is all
traffic generated by an instance of an application through its sockets
should be collected and stored persistently. There are a few sub
problems to solve.
Let's start with Android. They have added a driver [1] to Linux which
c
On 08/02/2011 08:55 AM, Mirco Tischler wrote:
> 2011/8/2 Steve Dickson :
>>
>>
>> On 08/02/2011 04:35 AM, Mirco Tischler wrote:
>>> 2011/8/2 Steve Dickson :
On 08/01/2011 09:10 PM, Mirco Tischler wrote:
> Hi
> 2011/8/2 Steve Dickson :
>>>
>>> Yes, this looks like a
2011/8/2 Steve Dickson :
>
>
> On 08/02/2011 04:35 AM, Mirco Tischler wrote:
>> 2011/8/2 Steve Dickson :
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/01/2011 09:10 PM, Mirco Tischler wrote:
Hi
2011/8/2 Steve Dickson :
>>
>> Yes, this looks like a good usecase.
>>
>> Hmm, does the automount point wor
Hello,
I noticed that the ypbind.service used multiple
EnvironmentFile lines so thought this would be a
good way to build command lines to daemons on the fly...
So the nfs-server.service looks like:
[Unit]
Description=NFS Protocol Daemon
After=network.target rpcbind.service
ConditionPathIsDire
On 08/02/2011 04:35 AM, Mirco Tischler wrote:
> 2011/8/2 Steve Dickson :
>>
>>
>> On 08/01/2011 09:10 PM, Mirco Tischler wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> 2011/8/2 Steve Dickson :
>
> Yes, this looks like a good usecase.
>
> Hmm, does the automount point work after boot?
It seems so, because
2011/8/2 Steve Dickson :
>
>
> On 08/01/2011 09:10 PM, Mirco Tischler wrote:
>> Hi
>> 2011/8/2 Steve Dickson :
Yes, this looks like a good usecase.
Hmm, does the automount point work after boot?
>>> It seems so, because if I restart nfs-idmap.service the
>>> service comes up.
>>
15 matches
Mail list logo