> Message du 25/04/11 19:30
> De : "Kay Sievers"
> A : "[email protected]"
> Copie à : [email protected]
> Objet : Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-clean and large files
>
>
> > I think that's a bug anyway, as that means that putting a correct conf file
> > in /etc/t
Lennart Poettering writes:
> Hmm, please don't put patches after the "-- " line in your mails. I have
> trouble responding to your patch mail that way, since my mailer cuts off
> signatures (i.e. everything after "-- ") automatically on reply.
Sorry about that, good to know for the future.
> I a
On Tue, 26.04.11 23:31, Miklos Vajna ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:26:18PM +0200, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > Hmm, doesn't apply on current git... :-(
> >
> > Can you rebase?
>
> Oh, sure I forgot to pull Kay's stacked config patches.
Thanks! Applied!
Lenna
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> I would suggest to leave the parsing of the fsck -C output to fsckd, as
> well as the integration of multiple of these streams. fsckd would then
> only pass one stream of progress bar information to plymouth. The
> handling in Plymo
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:26:18PM +0200, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Hmm, doesn't apply on current git... :-(
>
> Can you rebase?
Oh, sure I forgot to pull Kay's stacked config patches.
From 3f3b485ad26324e98d2c8a07f78c2c36f035f6cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miklos Vajna
Date: Wed, 20 Apr
On Tue, 26.04.11 23:24, Miklos Vajna ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:37:24PM +0200, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > OK, one last request before I merge it. Could you rename the conditional
> > to ENABLE_BINFMT please? I'd like to make clear that this is a boolean
> >
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:37:24PM +0200, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> OK, one last request before I merge it. Could you rename the conditional
> to ENABLE_BINFMT please? I'd like to make clear that this is a boolean
> conditional instead of anything elsse.
Sure, third version attached (including
On Tue, 26.04.11 16:59, Ray Strode ([email protected]) wrote:
> > Here's what I'd suggest: We already have systemd-fsck, which we could
> > beef up slightly to pass progress data to a tiny AF_UNIX socket
> > activated service (let's call it fsckd) which integrates the data from
> > multiple insta
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>> plymouth in Ubuntu 10.04 supports fsck progress report, and also
>> provides a chance for user to cancel running fsck. How to implement
>> this feature with systemd and plymouth?
>
> It's actually a really hard problem. For example
On Tue, 26.04.11 00:15, Milan Broz ([email protected]) wrote:
> /etc/crypttab uses "size" argument only for plain crypt mapping
> (and input is limited to volume key size)
>
> For LUKS it always read whole keyfile (no arguments except "luks"
> should be in crypttab).
>
> Because of bug in cryptse
On Mon, 25.04.11 11:58, Albert Strasheim ([email protected]) wrote:
Heya,
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Albert Strasheim wrote:
> > With systemd 25 I get:
> >> systemd[1]: Got invalid poll event on socket.
> > systemd[1]: foo.socket: Got invalid poll event (0x11) on socket.
>
> I think I
On Fri, 22.04.11 13:14, Michal Schmidt ([email protected]) wrote:
> Even after commit e5a53dc7 "cgroup: be nice to Ingo Molnar" systemd still
> hangs on boot on a kernel without CONFIG_CGROUPS.
>
> mount_setup() must not fail when cgroup controllers cannot be mounted.
>
> https://bugzilla.redh
On Mon, 25.04.11 14:38, William Douglas ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hello all,
heya,
>
> Below is an updated patch for tmpfile white listing.
Hmm, please don't put patches after the "-- " line in your mails. I have
trouble responding to your patch mail that way, since my mailer cuts
On Mon, 25.04.11 22:25, Miklos Vajna ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:02:39PM +0200, Miklos Vajna
> wrote:
> > I'm attaching a patch adding --disable-binfmt.
>
> Updated version, taking care of .automount/.mount units as well.
OK, one last request before I merge it.
On Mon, 25.04.11 19:23, Kay Sievers ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:12, [email protected]
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to use the systemd-tmpfiles-clean service with a backup
> > directory, but it always fails to start, with the "Value too large for
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/26/2011 01:54 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 25.04.11 20:51, microcai ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>> 于 2011年04月25日 20:43, Daniel J Walsh 写道:
>>> SELinux would be a good start.
>>
>> No, root inside can still change SE-Linux p
On Mon, 25.04.11 20:51, microcai ([email protected]) wrote:
> 于 2011年04月25日 20:43, Daniel J Walsh 写道:
> > SELinux would be a good start.
>
> No, root inside can still change SE-Linux policy.
No. The SELinux policy can forbid reloading the SELinux policy for
certain users/processes.
SE
17 matches
Mail list logo
