]] Lennart Poettering
| Detecting deadlocks is hard. (heck, the halting problem is
| undecidable). Not sure how much we realistically can do.
Given this is for debugging, have a command line param that dumps state
if starting/stopping a job takes more than N seconds? At least I'd be
happy with
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 17.01.11 22:57, 최찬우 ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>> Dear members,
>>
>>
>> I want to use 'systemd' instead of old init process.
>> Then I builded successfully "systemd-16" source in armel enviroment.
>>
>> Let me know the solution for this error.
>> I will expe
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:39:48PM +0100, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Older LVM versions used to create device nodes and symlinks to them on
> their own instead of leaving that to udev (nobody should do that: /dev
> is udev's territory and nobody else's). The effect of that is udev's
> database d
On Tue, 11.01.11 17:30, Marius Tolzmann ([email protected]) wrote:
> >>At last: Isn't that something lighttpd should take care off? Or the
> >>user should test before issuing a reload? Or a small script can do?
> >
> >Isn't one of the points of systemd to eliminate such small scripts?
>
> Mi
On Tue, 11.01.11 20:11, Alexander E. Patrakov ([email protected]) wrote:
> >There is no way you can notify systemd that the failed reload
> >attempt was just a test prior to executing the real reload command
> >(e.g. there is no ExecReloadPre or the like). (If a service keeps
> >running I won't c
On Mon, 10.01.11 18:49, Marius Tolzmann ([email protected]) wrote:
> and why do you explicitly not use the -D option and let systemd do
> all the forking stuff for you..? you could get rid off the Type=
> PIDFile= lines.. i also removed StandardError=syslog which seems to
> be redundant here.
On Tue, 11.01.11 15:46, Marius Tolzmann ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>
> hi again..
>
> On 01/11/11 11:51, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> >After more research, I found the under-documented lighttpd-angel
> >program. It does what is needed for babysitting lighttpd: performs the
> >"send SIG
On Tue, 11.01.11 09:54, Alexander E. Patrakov ([email protected]) wrote:
> instances of lighttpd to coexist for some time. See: after SIGINT,
> the old instance does not listen on port 80, but continues servicing
> large downloads that are still in progress. The new instance accepts
> new connect
On Mon, 10.01.11 20:22, Alexander E. Patrakov ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> 10.01.2011 18:57, Mirco Tischler wrote:
> >This patch should fix it. Can you test it? The problem was that after a
> >the mainpid exits,
> >and because there are commands left to execute systemd assumes it
> >executes a
On Mon, 10.01.11 15:11, Alexander E. Patrakov ([email protected]) wrote:
> [Unit]
> Description=Lighttpd Web Server
> After=network.target
>
> [Service]
> Type=forking
> EnvironmentFile=/etc/conf.d/lighttpd
> PIDFile=/var/run/lighttpd.pid
> ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/lighttpd -t -f /etc/lighttpd/lig
On Fri, 07.01.11 22:26, Henry Gebhardt ([email protected]) wrote:
> Dear list members,
>
> I have been maintaining a systemd overlay for Gentoo. Hence i was
> contacted about how to get miredo running with systemd. I herefore
> forward you the email, in the hope to get some help as to
On Tue, 11.01.11 09:39, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri ([email protected])
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Alexander E. Patrakov
> wrote:
> ...
> > ExecReload=/bin/kill -HUP $MAINPID
>
> This becoming a common case, shouldn't we have a ExecReloadSignal=HUP,
> or SignalReload=HUP?
On Tue, 11.01.11 12:30, Miklos Vajna ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 03:34:47PM +0500, "Alexander E. Patrakov"
> wrote:
> > 11.01.2011 15:24, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> > > Is there any chance this could be sumitted to the maintainers of the
> > > portable openssh? Having a
On Tue, 11.01.11 15:34, Alexander E. Patrakov ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> 11.01.2011 15:24, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> >Is there any chance this could be sumitted to the maintainers of
> >the portable openssh? Having a different version for each distro
> >is not something we want for sure.
>
> So
On Tue, 11.01.11 11:24, Miklos Vajna ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 02:12:13PM +0500, "Alexander E. Patrakov"
> wrote:
> > sshd.service has the following problem, which is a regression from a
> > traditional SysV setup and which is not present in sshd.socket +
> > ss
On Tue, 11.01.11 14:12, Alexander E. Patrakov ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have sshd-related unit files from http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-units/
>
> sshd.service has the following problem, which is a regression from a
> traditional SysV setup and which is not present in sshd.s
On Thu, 13.01.11 18:29, Daniel Poelzleithner ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently implementing a dynamic linux kernel optimizer called
> ulatencyd [1]. In my opinion the desktop experience (which applies to
> servers as well) can be much improved by dynamically adjusting the the
> k
On Fri, 14.01.11 09:19, Tollef Fog Heen ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> ]] Lennart Poettering
>
> | > What I wonder in this case, why vnstat.service/reload appears to hang
> | > in this case? The job itself fails during startup (initscript is
> | > disabled, so it gets indirect request from ifup and
On Sat, 15.01.11 10:00, Andrey Borzenkov ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > 2011/1/14 Eugeni Dodonov :
> >> I know that it is perhaps a simple newbie question, but is it something
> >> that must be changed in our messagebus init script (atta
On Fri, 14.01.11 18:14, Eugeni Dodonov ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> when playing with systemd by default on Mandriva (e.g., with
> systemd-sysvinit installed and booting), we have faced a strange problem
> when rebooting - the reboot process simple hanged and would not proceed.
>
>
On Sun, 16.01.11 01:46, Tom Gundersen ([email protected]) wrote:
> This is now done by a generator, shipped downstream.
Fantastic! I love deleting code! You rock!
Commited both patches!
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
___
systemd-devel mail
On Sun, 16.01.11 03:29, Miklos Vajna ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to test LVM when using systemd, but it seems something
> essential is missing on my test box.
>
> Here is what I tried:
>
> Our sysv lvm init script provides an LSB header, so it gets executed
> early on boo
On Mon, 17.01.11 22:57, 최찬우 ([email protected]) wrote:
> Dear members,
>
>
> I want to use 'systemd' instead of old init process.
> Then I builded successfully "systemd-16" source in armel enviroment.
>
> Let me know the solution for this error.
> I will expect for your reply.
The only guess
Dear members,
I want to use 'systemd' instead of old init process.
Then I builded successfully "systemd-16" source in armel enviroment.
But, I faced following booting error :
-
3.038309] Btrfs detected SSD devices, enabling SSD mode
[3.046861] VFS: Mounted
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:44:46PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Tomasz Torcz
>
> Hi,
>
> | “ SIGUSR2
> |When this signal is received the systemd manager will log its
> complete
> |state in human readable form. The data logged is the same as
> printed by sys
25 matches
Mail list logo
