1;2700;0cOn Sun, 14.11.10 10:25, Matthias Clasen ([email protected])
wrote:
> Here are two patches I needed to get systemd to build against the
> current libnotify and vala releases.
Thanks! Applied!
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
___
On Sun, 14.11.10 08:04, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri ([email protected])
wrote:
> See attached patch.
Thanks! Applied.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fr
On Mon, 15.11.10 16:50, Ludwig Nussel ([email protected]) wrote:
> > Fixed this now. Ideally Debian/Ubuntu would stop renaming agetty like
> > this, or at least do it via symlink only. I'd love to get rid of the
> > differences between the distros here.
>
> Why is the (a)getty service file p
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 03.11.10 22:49, Andrew Edmunds ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> > A few points about these two source files.
> > 1. [email protected] has:
> > > m4_ifdef(`TARGET_FEDORA', `m4_define(`GETTY', `/sbin/agetty
> > > 38400')')m4_dnl
> > > m4_ifdef(`TARGET_SUS
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> > Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > [...]
> >> I am really not a big fan of Suse's $ALL extension.
> >
> > Making SuSEfirewall2 run last via $ALL mostly is a boot speed
> > optimization. The filtering rules (pote
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Thu, 11.11.10 14:06, Andreas Jaeger ([email protected]) wrote:
>> > On Thursday 11 November 2010 12:50:44 Kay Sievers wrote:
>> > > [...]
>> > > > Anyway, the point of this was only to have getty start late(ish)
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 11.11.10 14:06, Andreas Jaeger ([email protected]) wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 November 2010 12:50:44 Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > Anyway, the point of this was only to have getty start late(ish) in
> > > > the boot process, after most of the other services
