Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] dbus: fix --system handling

2010-11-08 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 05.11.10 17:11, Robert Schwebel ([email protected]) wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:26:04AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > Sorry for the delayed reply. Needed to think a bit about this. > > > > Your patch would break running "systemd --system --test" to verify the > >

Re: [systemd-devel] An update

2010-11-08 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Greg KH wrote: [ ... ] > A lot of us don't like ConnMan for a lot of good reasons (i.e. it does > not work for our use cases.)  It also seems to be a dead-end of > development and constantly plays catch-up for NetworkManager.  So, we > can get this resolved in the

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] add bash completion for systemctl --system

2010-11-08 Thread Ran Benita
I've been playing recently with systemd on Arch, and had much fun. But soon, alas, my fingers started to ache from repeatedly writing systemctl restart some-long-service.service. So, I wrote a completion script. I figured other people may want to use it, so I prepared a patch against systemd-git (a

Re: [systemd-devel] An update

2010-11-08 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
Of course I did forget the attached file in previous On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 02:15:02PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Canek Pel??ez Val

Re: [systemd-devel] An update

2010-11-08 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 02:15:02PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Canek Pel??ez Vald??s >> wrote: >> > Hi; I just wanted to give an update on the status of my system running >> > Gentoo with systemd. I ru