Hi; I'm using (with a high success) systemd in my Gentoo system.
However, even with really few services running my startup time is not
that different from OpenRC, and my PID count is really high; with an
emergency boot, it's on the order of 1,500. I suspect the first
problem is caused by the second
2010/10/25 Andrey Borzenkov :
> As this is used in RPM, it means no getty gets installed on systemd new
> install:
>
> {pts/0}% sudo systemctl enable [email protected]
> Unit name [email protected] is not a valid unit name.
> Cannot install unit [email protected]: Invalid argument
>
You probably want
co
As this is used in RPM, it means no getty gets installed on systemd new install:
{pts/0}% sudo systemctl enable [email protected]
Unit name [email protected] is not a valid unit name.
Cannot install unit [email protected]: Invalid argument
This is likely result of this commit:
commit 71fad6751434f06485a7
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
>> +static int mount_points_list_umount(MountPoint **mount_point_list_head) {
>> + MountPoint *mp, *mp_next;
>> + int failed = 0;
>> +
>> + LIST_FOREACH_SAFE(mount_point, mp, mp_next, *mount_point_list_head)
>>
2010/10/24 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri :
>
> well, just do the patch, test to see if you handled it right (ie:
> you're not looping forever in code) and mail, Lennart might like that
> option you propose.
Sure, proposed patch is attached.
I've tested it on my laptop and it works fine for me.
Cheers,
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2010/10/24 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri :
>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> 2010/10/24 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri :
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Together with fidencio I tracked down
2010/10/24 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri :
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> 2010/10/24 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri :
>>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Together with fidencio I tracked down the bug which caused / *not* to
be remounted ro on shut
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2010/10/24 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri :
>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> Together with fidencio I tracked down the bug which caused / *not* to
>>> be remounted ro on shutdown.
>>>
>>> The relevant code is in src/um
2010/10/24 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri :
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Together with fidencio I tracked down the bug which caused / *not* to
>> be remounted ro on shutdown.
>>
>> The relevant code is in src/umount.c
>>
>> 2010/10/7 :
>>> +int umount_all(void) {
>>> +
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Together with fidencio I tracked down the bug which caused / *not* to
> be remounted ro on shutdown.
>
> The relevant code is in src/umount.c
>
> 2010/10/7 :
>> +int umount_all(void) {
>> + int r;
>> + LIST_HEAD(MountPoint, mp
Together with fidencio I tracked down the bug which caused / *not* to
be remounted ro on shutdown.
The relevant code is in src/umount.c
2010/10/7 :
> +int umount_all(void) {
> + int r;
> + LIST_HEAD(MountPoint, mp_list_head);
> +
> + LIST_HEAD_INIT(MountPoint, mp_list_head);
11 matches
Mail list logo
