On Wed, 15.09.10 01:54, Zbyszek Szmek ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:23:28PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Tue, 07.09.10 17:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected])
> > wrote:
> >
> > Urks, now I commited the wrong one... Can you prep an updated p
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:23:28PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 07.09.10 17:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> Urks, now I commited the wrong one... Can you prep an updated patch against
> current git?
Once more sorry about that.
Fix below.
Zbyszek
---
On Tue, 07.09.10 17:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote:
Urks, now I commited the wrong one... Can you prep an updated patch against
current git?
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
system
On Tue, 07.09.10 10:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote:
I have now merged the first three patches. Regarding the fourth one I am
not entirely sure.
More discussion should probably happen here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626891
Lennart
--
Lennart Poetter
On Mon, 13.09.10 13:25, Michael Biebl ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> 2010/9/13 Lennart Poettering :
> >
> > Comments? Anything I forgot to cover?
>
> Yeah, the set of (default) targets shipped by systemd, like
> multi-user, fsck, umount etc.
Added now. Thanks for the pointer!
Lennart
--
Lenna
On Sun, 12.09.10 23:44, Piavlo ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> Thanks for you reply
>
> > If I may guess. Stuff started with @ are not "real" services. Those you
> > have to delete manually in the wants directory, i.e
> > /etc/systemd/system/getty.target.wants.
>
> > I think it's
On Sun, 12.09.10 16:30, Piavlo ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If this mailing list is not appropriate place to ask such questions, can
> you point me to the correct one?
For now this ML is actually the right place. I am however swamped with
emails each day, and sometimes I don't find the
On Mon, 06.09.10 12:44, Piavlo ([email protected]) wrote:
> [r...@fedora2 ~]# systemctl disable [email protected]
> Couldn't find [email protected].
> [r...@fedora2 ~]#
> -
>
> why disable does not work?
For instanced services "enable" and "disable" should be called for t
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 18:40, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 14.09.10 11:58, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri ([email protected])
> wrote:
>
>> Lennart, maybe we should make the kmod-setup take another flag "MUST"
>> and "OPTIONAL", do modprobe for each module in separate and fail if
>> "MUST
On Tue, 14.09.10 11:58, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri ([email protected])
wrote:
> Lennart, maybe we should make the kmod-setup take another flag "MUST"
> and "OPTIONAL", do modprobe for each module in separate and fail if
> "MUST" are not present? Right now it is confusing for users.
Well, I d
On Tue, 14.09.10 16:47, Cristian Axenie ([email protected]) wrote:
> [ 19.59] systemd[1]: Failed to open /dev/autofs: No such file or
Seems the automounter is not compiled in. Either don't use .automount
units or enable it in the kernel. My recommendation is the latter.
> Here the
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Cristian Axenie
wrote:
> Hi !
> I've managed to patch the source code to eliminate the sysvinit and ipv6
> problems during bootup but now I encountered some error messages that refer
> to other issues.
>
> Here is each line of the output and my ideas :
>
> [ 18.
Hi !
I've managed to patch the source code to eliminate the sysvinit and ipv6
problems during bootup but now I encountered some error messages that refer
to other issues.
Here is each line of the output and my ideas :
[ 18.76] Freeing init memory: 152K
[ 19.41] systemd[1]: systemd 8 r
13 matches
Mail list logo
