Re: [systemd-devel] 'tasks' as first-order objects?

2010-08-12 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Lennart Poettering | > > So, maybe "Type=transient" is nicer? Sounds a bit scientific but this | > > word is not unheard in the Free software world at least (i.e. X uses | > > that iirc) and describes pretty accurately what these kind of processes | > > are used for, i.e. transient, temporary,

Re: [systemd-devel] [systemd-commits] 2 commits - fixme Makefile.am man/systemctl.xml src/systemctl.c units/fedora

2010-08-12 Thread Fatih Aşıcı
On Friday 13 August 2010 03:19:34 Lennart Poettering wrote: > +ExecStartPost=-/usr/bin/plymouth message '--text=Halting...' Is it possible to localize these strings/commands? Does the method below work? ExecStartPost=-/usr/bin/plymouth message '--text=Halting...' ExecStartPost[tr]=-/usr/bin/ply

Re: [systemd-devel] 'tasks' as first-order objects?

2010-08-12 Thread Adam Spragg
On Thursday 12 Aug 2010 20:56:33 Bill Nottingham wrote: > Lennart Poettering ([email protected]) said: > > Well, "Type=finish" is supposed to be exactly what Upstart calls > > "tasks". I must admit that the word "finish" for this sucks, so we are > > open to change this to make it more discove

Re: [systemd-devel] 'tasks' as first-order objects?

2010-08-12 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 12.08.10 15:56, Bill Nottingham ([email protected]) wrote: > > Well, "Type=finish" is supposed to be exactly what Upstart calls > > "tasks". I must admit that the word "finish" for this sucks, so we are > > open to change this to make it more discoverable. However, I am not sure > > "task

Re: [systemd-devel] 'tasks' as first-order objects?

2010-08-12 Thread Bill Nottingham
Lennart Poettering ([email protected]) said: > > upstart jobs have two main types - 'services' and 'tasks'. systemd, while it > > has many other types, doesn't have a 'task' analogue. So, for anything that > > has the semantics of a task (at this time/dependency, do this thing and > > exit),

Re: [systemd-devel] 'tasks' as first-order objects?

2010-08-12 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 12.08.10 11:59, Bill Nottingham ([email protected]) wrote: Heya, > upstart jobs have two main types - 'services' and 'tasks'. systemd, while it > has many other types, doesn't have a 'task' analogue. So, for anything that > has the semantics of a task (at this time/dependency, do this th

[systemd-devel] 'tasks' as first-order objects?

2010-08-12 Thread Bill Nottingham
upstart jobs have two main types - 'services' and 'tasks'. systemd, while it has many other types, doesn't have a 'task' analogue. So, for anything that has the semantics of a task (at this time/dependency, do this thing and exit), ends up being encoded as a service of type 'finish', often with 'Va