[systemd-devel] Archlinux patch for services and getty

2010-05-18 Thread Marius O
Hello, I don't know if Arch is considered a well-known distribution, but here's a patch for adding a base for Arch specific services. Also, how should we proceed in regards to higher level services ? (*DM, udev, etc) Should they be maintained into the main tree, or sepparately ? Regards, -Marius

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADS-UP] CONFIG_CGROUP_DEBUG=y no longer necessary

2010-05-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 18.05.10 16:50, Ozan Çağlayan ([email protected]) wrote: > > Tuesday 18 May 2010 günü (saat 10:35:05) Dhaval Giani şunları yazmıştı: > > > This requires libcgroup v0.36 to work properly, which Dhaval will > > > release any minute now. > > > > And the release tarballs for libcgroup v0.36

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADS-UP] CONFIG_CGROUP_DEBUG=y no longer necessary

2010-05-18 Thread Ozan Çağlayan
Tuesday 18 May 2010 günü (saat 10:35:05) Dhaval Giani şunları yazmıştı: > > This requires libcgroup v0.36 to work properly, which Dhaval will > > release any minute now. > > And the release tarballs for libcgroup v0.36 are available at > http://sourceforge.net/projects/libcg/files/ > Does system

[systemd-devel] [HEADS-UP] cgroups patch for procps

2010-05-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
Heya, if you package systemd for a distribution you might want to add this patch to your procps package, on top of the cgroup patch that is already shipped by (at least Fedora's) procps package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593267 Turns the output of "ps xawf -eo pid,args,user,cgr

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADS-UP] CONFIG_CGROUP_DEBUG=y no longer necessary

2010-05-18 Thread Dhaval Giani
> This requires libcgroup v0.36 to work properly, which Dhaval will > release any minute now. > And the release tarballs for libcgroup v0.36 are available at http://sourceforge.net/projects/libcg/files/ Thanks! Dhaval ___ systemd-devel mailing list syst