Re: [Sursound] idea

2013-05-04 Thread Iain Mott
next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130504/ce0d9048/attachment.html> > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@mu

[Sursound] idea

2013-05-04 Thread Matthew Palmer
t;https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130504/ce0d9048/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] impulse responses and distance

2013-05-04 Thread Iain Mott
> There is one more refinement you could use to limit the amount of > CPU use. Of course the IRs for different source directions will be > different. But the *signficant* differences are only in the first 100 > ms or so. In many cases the 'tail' of the reverb will sound just the > same even if the