[SM-USERS] reply to per folder setting

2013-01-26 Thread julius
hi, first of all, this is probably the wrong mailing list but since theres no user mailing list where else should i post? im looking for a webmail solution that allows the following: if you have a folder hirarchy like this: yahoo acccount  - inbox  - sent google account  - inbox  - sent w

[SM-USERS] No Options page

2005-11-29 Thread Julius Thyssen
nfig.php is visualized here: http://jult.net/txt/config (I'm currently trying to solve this issue, so this file changes accordingly..) -- Adios Julius --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for

Re: [SM-USERS] No Options page

2005-11-29 Thread Julius Thyssen
e I'm not alone in this. It seems I am, in which case I will revert back to 1.4.5 because I'm not here to spend time on errors like this, I was hoping it was a simple and known error/bug that I could easily solve. I was once told by someone to use the CVS version, but I think I won't lis

Re: [SM-USERS] No Options page

2005-11-29 Thread Julius Thyssen
Just so you know; Reverting back to SquirrelMail/1.4.5 [CVS] solved it. Maybe that helps. By the way; I always need to patch files because of the enormous message-ID-length and header-slack created by the Delivery class files etc. It would be great if these parts were all optional. Personally I be

Re: [SM-USERS] No Options page

2005-11-30 Thread Julius Thyssen
so forth. Obviously it isn't 'stable', so this is bad advice. I will not be using 1.4.6 until such problems are out, and I can't imagine I will be the only one experiencing them. It's a SM problem, not my OS or PHP version's, because they are

Re: [SM-USERS] No Options page

2005-11-30 Thread Julius Thyssen
On 11/30/05, Paul Lesneiwski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Reverting back to SquirrelMail/1.4.5 [CVS] solved it. > > 1.4.5 has been released, so 1.4.5cvs is not very accurate unless you > speak of a pre-release cvs snapshot of 1.4.5 (in which case now you are > vulnerable to several known security