[SM-USERS] avelsieve

Has anyone found a fix for the new Avelsieve version? It seems like there is a php related error with the new rule creation which applies to all messages. It just simply dies on my machine anyway, whereas other methods of rule creation seem to work. Unfortunately the older versions don't see

Re: [SM-USERS] avelsieve

information for SM is lost and the user is forced to log back in again. This is with SM 1.2.8, and the latest downloadable plugin. - Original Message - From: "Alexandros Vellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David Chait" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: [SM-USERS] avelsieve

() in /web-ssl/plugins/avelsieve/addrule.php on line 427 - Original Message - From: "Alexandros Vellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David Chait" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 11:04 PM Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] a

Re: [SM-USERS] INBOX Problem

Cyrus is definitly misconfigured if you are using mbox format, I suggest you RTFM and get cyrus working as a first step. - Original Message - From: "Jonathan Angliss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Rajan Mani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:08 PM S

Re: [SM-USERS] courier imap ,Maildir

Drop Postfix and use Exim or Qmail, either works very well with Courier IMAP. _ David Chait Sys Admin - Facilities Operations 333 Bonair Siding Road #107 Stanford CA, 94305 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "He

Re: [SM-USERS] courier imap ,Maildir

I've honestly never used postfix with Courier, only Cyrus. However I have used both Exim and Qmail with Courier sucessfully, so I know both work quite well. _____ David Chait Sys Admin - Facilities Operations 333 Bonair Siding Road

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL Problem

Alan, We've been plagued with these bugs for months over the course of several SM versions on several machines. If you find an answer, I'd love to hear it. -David _____ David Chait Sys Admin - Facilities Operations 333 Bon

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: Random Problems with SM 1.2.10

n internal machine, though the problem exists even on non-proxied requests. We've tried several versions of both Netscape and IE, none with any great effect. -David _____ David Chait Sys Admin - Facilities Operations 333 Bonair Siding Road #

Re: [SM-USERS] Pls Help Me...

Could be a problem with the authentication mechanism. Is courier configured to use plain logins or only encrypted? - Original Message - From: "Shalabh Agarwal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 9:33 PM Subject: RE: [SM-USERS] Pls Help Me... > I tried

Re: [SM-USERS] what IMAP server to use

If you cannot telnet to it on port 143 then it is NOT running, all you did was execute the daemon manually. - Original Message - From: "Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:50 AM Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] what IMAP server to use > Hi, > > I hav

Re: [SM-USERS] Help

Authentication is not conducted through SM, but through your IMAP server, I suggest you start there. - Original Message - From: "Jeetendra Handa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 11:10 PM Subject: [SM-USERS] Help > Hi All > > I want use personal a

Re: [SM-USERS] Why is squirrelmail slow?

It opens one of my mailboxes with over 50k messages in just under 20 seconds. The difference of course is hardware, I am using mid level Dell server class machines vs. low end desktops such as the two cases listed below. You need a high end disk system and lots of memory to do this right with a goo

Re: [SM-USERS] (no subject)

This is definitly an apache issue, not SM. If I were you I would verify you are using a current version, and consider moving to RH 9, 8 was never very stable for me. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 12:35 AM Subject:

Re: [SM-USERS] SM vs IMAP/SSL

Not true at all, all CLIENT communication is encrypted, but comms within your own environment between the web server and the IMAP server are still plain text. - Original Message - From: "Ben Sabini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [SM-USERS] SM - Mailbox directory

You can't, SM is designed to be an IMAP client, which by definition requires an IMAP mailbox on the other side, not a flat UCB mbox or text file. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 1:45 PM Subject: [SM-USERS] SM - Mailbox d

Re: [SM-USERS] LDAP

Verify that you are using the right LDAP search string for that server. _ David Chait Sys Admin - Facilities Operations 333 Bonair Siding Road #107 Stanford CA, 94305 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Rusty T

Re: [SM-USERS] Sub folders in IMAP

different discussion. I have over 200 subfolders under Inbox at various levels of hiarchy, all with mail in my own mailbox here without an issue. -David _ David Chait Sys Admin - Facilities Operations 333 Bonair Siding Road #107 Stanford CA

Re: [SM-USERS] Please help me resolve this issue!

Verify your permissions settings, the web server should have read/write permissions to some of those files by default. _ David Chait Sys Admin - Facilities Operations 333 Bonair Siding Road #107 Stanford CA, 94305 [EMAIL PROTECTED