Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail aborting large attachment download?

2012-10-09 Thread Juergen Nickelsen
[TLDR: taking out imapproxy resolved the issue; we'll live with that for now] Hello, three weeks ago, I wrote this: > [...] in a few single cases, users have complained that the download of a > large attachment failed due to the object being no longer present, > according to SquirrelMail, and af

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail aborting large attachment download?

2012-10-09 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
Juergen Nickelsen-3 wrote: > > The user mailboxes are distributed over a number of Dovecot servers for > performance reasons, and Perdition relays the IMAP connection to the > responsible server. > ... > While having imapproxy taking load off Perdition would be nice, we can > do without for now.

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail aborting large attachment download?

2012-10-09 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Juergen Nickelsen wrote: > [TLDR: taking out imapproxy resolved the issue; we'll live with that for > now] > > Hello, > > three weeks ago, I wrote this: > >> [...] in a few single cases, users have complained that the download of a >> large attachment failed due to