Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail aborting large attachment download?

2012-09-24 Thread Juergen Nickelsen
On 22.09.2012 09:40, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > Juergen Nickelsen-3 wrote: [...] >> Yet, in a few single cases, users have complained that the download of a >> large attachment failed due to the object being no longer present, >> according to SquirrelMail, and after clicking on the folder name, >> Sq

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail aborting large attachment download?

2012-09-24 Thread michael crane
On Mon, September 24, 2012 12:55 pm, Juergen Nickelsen wrote: > On 22.09.2012 09:40, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > >> Juergen Nickelsen-3 wrote: > [...] >>> Yet, in a few single cases, users have complained that the download of >>> a >>> large attachment failed due to the object being no longer present,

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail aborting large attachment download?

2012-09-24 Thread Juergen Nickelsen
On 24.09.2012 14:30, michael crane wrote: [PHP memory limit] >> 256 MB (we could increase that -- is that per Session or for all of >> them?); no commercial extensions, rather PHP as it comes out of the >> (Debian) box with a few common extensions: > I thought the PHP limit was per message. You m

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail aborting large attachment download?

2012-09-24 Thread michael crane
On Mon, September 24, 2012 1:44 pm, Juergen Nickelsen wrote: > On 24.09.2012 14:30, michael crane wrote: > > [PHP memory limit] >>> 256 MB (we could increase that -- is that per Session or for all of >>> them?); no commercial extensions, rather PHP as it comes out of the >>> (Debian) box with a fe

[SM-USERS] Re: SquirrelMail aborting large attachment download?

2012-09-24 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
2012.09.24 14:55 Juergen Nickelsen rašė: > On 22.09.2012 09:40, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > >> Juergen Nickelsen-3 wrote: > [...] >>> Yet, in a few single cases, users have complained that the download of >>> a >>> large attachment failed due to the object being no longer present, >>> according to Squi