Thank you for the reply.
I agree that sorting by "sent" brings a certain dose of unreliability, and
my reasons to use it are a bit unusual ( one of bussiness processes require
us to check that date, and i can't teach my users to read mail headers).
Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 20
Thank you for the answers, they solved my issue.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Other-sort-fields-in-squirrelmail-web-interface-tp33544983p33673864.html
Sent from the squirrelmail-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
Hello again,
> It's impossible to respond to this without any further information
(i.e., see my last message). Thanks for looking into it.
With some network sniffing it looks like the following part is causing the
problem.
Case 1) When opening a message the first time, the server responds with
On 4/12/12, Bot wrote:
>
> Thank you for the answers, they solved my issue.
Please quote the message you're replying to next time.
To be clear, my answer was confusing since I didn't respond correctly
to exactly what you were asking. You can't have more than one date
field in SquirrelMail 1.4.
