[SM-USERS] Consquences of $lossy_encoding?

2012-02-09 Thread Juergen Nickelsen
Hello all, in the SquirrelMail installation I have inherited recently, we support English and German, both with the ISO 8859-1 charset. When replying to UTF8-encoded messages containing, for instane, german umlauts, there is the usual charset problem. I am preparing a new installation at the mome

Re: [SM-USERS] Consquences of $lossy_encoding?

2012-02-09 Thread Juergen Nickelsen
On 09.02.2012 13:58, Juergen Nickelsen wrote: > in the SquirrelMail installation I have inherited recently, [...] > So, now my question is: are there any other consequences than the > intended one I should be aware of when I set $lossy_encoding = true? Sorry, I forgot: This is a 1.4.21. Regards,

Re: [SM-USERS] Consquences of $lossy_encoding?

2012-02-09 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
Juergen Nickelsen-3 wrote: > > Hello all, > > in the SquirrelMail installation I have inherited recently, we support > English and German, both with the ISO 8859-1 charset. When replying to > UTF8-encoded messages containing, for instane, german umlauts, there is > the usual charset problem. >

Re: [SM-USERS] Consquences of $lossy_encoding?

2012-02-09 Thread michael crane
On 9 February 2012 17:04, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > lossy encoding improves existing situation, if webmail users handle only > emails that contain texts in their native or similar language. For Germans > with iso-8859-1 main problems are smart quotes and euro symbol. Of course the sensible solutio

Re: [SM-USERS] Consquences of $lossy_encoding?

2012-02-09 Thread Juergen Nickelsen
On 09.02.2012 18:04, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > If you reply to Cyrillic text, all text will be converted to ?. Yes, I have tried exactly that, finally putting the spam in Russian to some good use. :-) > lossy encoding improves existing situation, if webmail users handle only > emails that contain

Re: [SM-USERS] Consquences of $lossy_encoding?

2012-02-09 Thread Juergen Nickelsen
On 09.02.2012 18:17, michael crane wrote: > Of course the sensible solution is for everybody to use english. Right. And use ASCII like God has created it. (Pardon my French. ;-) -- Juergen Nickelsen Freie Universitaet Berlin, Zentraleinrichtung fuer Datenverarbeitung Fabeckstrasse 32, 14195 Ber

Re: [SM-USERS] Consquences of $lossy_encoding?

2012-02-09 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Juergen Nickelsen wrote: > Hello all, > > in the SquirrelMail installation I have inherited recently, we support > English and German, both with the ISO 8859-1 charset. When replying to > UTF8-encoded messages containing, for instane, german umlauts, there is > the

Re: [SM-USERS] Consquences of $lossy_encoding?

2012-02-09 Thread Juergen Nickelsen
On 2012-02-09 19:38, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > At some point in the next year, we'll start pushing harder to get all > the SquirrelMail translations changed over to all utf-8. That is a good thing! Recently I read someone stating, half-jokingly, that there are only two kinds of character encoding