Re: [SM-USERS] default signature

2010-09-17 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
Goran Obradović wrote: > > It's hard to get (see) logs from foreign systems to be shore where the > problem is but based on fact > that email sent from the same sender to the same recipient but using IMAP > or SMTP client (instead of > Squirrelmail) wasn't recognised as junk mail raise suspicion

Re: [SM-USERS] default signature

2010-09-17 Thread Goran Obradović
I agree with you, but it's almost impossible to "fight with windmills". -Original Message- From: Tomas Kuliavas [mailto:to...@users.sourceforge.net] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 10:07 AM To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] default signature Goran O

Re: [SM-USERS] default signature

2010-09-17 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
Goran Obradović wrote: > > I agree with you, but it's almost impossible to "fight with windmills". > Don Quixote used wrong approach. We have cannons, rpg-7 and icbms these days. What will you do when your emails will be tagged as spam without that footer? If it was bayes and user continues

Re: [SM-USERS] default signature

2010-09-17 Thread Goran Obradović
Do you see glass half full or half empty? :) :) :) I had problems with only few (none of them is "worldwide known") domains and I had problems only if users are using squirrelmail. After I removed that footer those problems disappeared - for me this problem is solved. -Original Message- F