* Paul Lesniewski :
> > This patch renders my server inoperable. It drives the load from 2.57
> > avg. up to 121 (!) in a few minutes.
>
> Huh. Obviously more analysis is needed. Are you absolutely sure this
> was the only thing you changed before the load skyrocketed?
Yes. I applied the patch
> If you are willing to sacrifice usability of your machine for another
> five minutes, you can try re-applying that patch, then changing the
> following lines in functions/mime.php:
>
> 1) comment out line 792 so it looks like:
>
> //case '"':
>
> 2) change line 843 so it looks like
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
> * Paul Lesniewski :
>
>> > This patch renders my server inoperable. It drives the load from 2.57
>> > avg. up to 121 (!) in a few minutes.
>>
>> Huh. Obviously more analysis is needed. Are you absolutely sure this
>> was the only thing
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
>> If you are willing to sacrifice usability of your machine for another
>> five minutes, you can try re-applying that patch, then changing the
>> following lines in functions/mime.php:
>>
>> 1) comment out line 792 so it looks like:
>>
>>
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
> wrote:
>>> If you are willing to sacrifice usability of your machine for another
>>> five minutes, you can try re-applying that patch, then changing the
>>> following lines in functions/
> > SM completely ceased to work.
>
> I don't understand that. You said it seemed to fix the issue.
Yes, it fixed the issue when I tested it, but at the same time it was
driving the load higher and higher up to the point where the whole
machine wouldn't respond to anything.
> SM *works* for me
* Paul Lesniewski :
> > I applied that patch and made the changes you mention above.
> > The machine is working fine (load still 2.46 just like befor applying
> > the patch!), and the patch seems to work.
>
> Thanks. I'm a bit surprised at this, so I would appreciate knowing if
> your load remai
Whenever I reply an email, squirrelmail attache HTML source rather the
message itself. My recipient does not see the attached message but HTML
source.
How can I turn this feature off.
- Mogusa
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Why-Reply-attache-HTML-Source-tp25665614p25665
* Paul Lesniewski :
> And if you're feeling even more adventurous, might I ask you to revert
> these changes and try the original patch again to be double sure it
> kills the machine? It's just that this second version shouldn't be
> that different than the first
Done. Machine still working.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
> wrote:
>> * Paul Lesniewski :
>>
>>> And if you're feeling even more adventurous, might I ask you to revert
>>> these changes and try the original patch again to be double sure it
>>> ki
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
> * Paul Lesniewski :
>
>> And if you're feeling even more adventurous, might I ask you to revert
>> these changes and try the original patch again to be double sure it
>> kills the machine? It's just that this second version shouldn't be
>
* Paul Lesniewski :
> It may be possible that it's just one particular action or email
> message content that triggers a problem with this patch - in which
> case maybe SM gets caught in an endless loop eating all your server
> memory or the likes. You didn't happen to notice a runaway httpd
> th
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
> * Paul Lesniewski :
>
>> It may be possible that it's just one particular action or email
>> message content that triggers a problem with this patch - in which
>> case maybe SM gets caught in an endless loop eating all your server
>> memo
13 matches
Mail list logo
