Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail -- timestamp bug

2019-05-09 Thread jan-jun.2...@dipl-ing-kessler.de
PLEASE IGNORE -- ISSUE HAS BEEN SOLVED This email was accidentally sent from a non-registered address and hence it was kept in cache on the server and released ages later. BR, Markus >> On , jan-jun.2...@dipl-ing-kessler.de wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> >>> it seems that I have found a lit

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail -- timestamp bug

2019-05-09 Thread Markus Robert Kessler
> On , jan-jun.2...@dipl-ing-kessler.de wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> >> it seems that I have found a little bug. >> >> Therefore I've done a short recording for demonstration, see here: >> >> >> https://www.dipl-ing-kessler.de/tmp/squirrel-mail_bug_1.mp4 >> >> >> When creating a new email and saving it

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail -- timestamp bug

2019-04-30 Thread Paul Lesniewski
> Besides this, the timestamp shown in received emails seems to be the > "sent" timestamp and not the timstamp received. So, I recognized this bug > at all. Click to sort messages by the received column. Otherwise, use the IMAP info plugin to look at results of test number 6 and debug your system

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail -- timestamp bug

2019-04-20 Thread jan-jun.2...@dipl-ing-kessler.de
> On , jan-jun.2...@dipl-ing-kessler.de wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> >> it seems that I have found a little bug. >> >> Therefore I've done a short recording for demonstration, see here: >> >> >> https://www.dipl-ing-kessler.de/tmp/squirrel-mail_bug_1.mp4 >> >> >> When creating a new email and saving it

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail -- timestamp bug

2019-04-20 Thread Voytek Eymont
On , jan-jun.2...@dipl-ing-kessler.de wrote: > Hi all, > > > it seems that I have found a little bug. > > Therefore I've done a short recording for demonstration, see here: > > > https://www.dipl-ing-kessler.de/tmp/squirrel-mail_bug_1.mp4 > > > When creating a new email and saving it as a draft, th