Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail for 4K users

2004-09-09 Thread Lesli St. Clair
I tend to agree. I'm (trying) to run SM on a dual processor Sun with 4 GB, solely as a web client (IMAP and smtp are elsewhere) and 300 or so simultaneous users uses up all the processor. And that's with a PHP accellerator (Zend). I'm still poling around trying to find some way to make this wor

RE: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail for 4K users

2004-09-09 Thread Joe Aldeguer
] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 2:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail for 4K users > So, I am looking into possibly using SquirrelMail to provide web mail > access for our website members it is currently running on a Dell 2400 > Power

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail for 4K users

2004-09-09 Thread John Madden
> So, I am looking into possibly using SquirrelMail to provide web mail > access for our website members it is currently running on a Dell 2400 > Power Edge dual processor, scsi, 60 GIG HD, 1.5 Gig RAM using White Box > Linux 3.0 ES for my OS. I have read the FAQ's for enhancing SQM > performance w

RE: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail for 4K users

2004-09-09 Thread Joe Aldeguer
show its appreciation when we start using it. -Original Message- From: Jonathan Angliss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 12:28 PM To: Joe Aldeguer Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail for 4K users Hello Joe, On Thursday, September 09,

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail for 4K users

2004-09-09 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Joe, On Thursday, September 09, 2004, Joe Aldeguer wrote... > The idea of paying MS thousands of dollars in licensing fees to run > Exchange using OWA is way over our budget. It's easy to justify costs to management sometimes ;) > So, I am looking into possibly using SquirrelMail to provid

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail for 4K users

2004-09-09 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Joe Aldeguer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > sad excuse for an IMAP server called Exchange (2000). > ha...ha..too boring to learn also. It's awful: It cannot do server side sorting or threading. Thus, all has to be done internally by Squirrelmail, which means it's slower. -- Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. de

RE: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail for 4K users

2004-09-09 Thread Joe Aldeguer
09, 2004 10:39 AM To: Charles Boling Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail for 4K users * Charles Boling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Just curious, more than anything: > Are you hooking SquirrelMail to MS Exchange, or are you going to use a > dif

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail for 4K users

2004-09-09 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Charles Boling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Just curious, more than anything: > Are you hooking SquirrelMail to MS Exchange, or are you going to use a > different IMAP server? Both, simultaneously. But Courier-IMAP performs much better than that sad excuse for an IMAP server called Exchange (2000).

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail for 4K users

2004-09-09 Thread Jay Lee
Joe Aldeguer said: > So, I am looking into possibly using SquirrelMail to provide web mail > access > for our website members it is currently running on a Dell 2400 Power Edge > dual processor, scsi, 60 GIG HD, 1.5 Gig RAM using White Box Linux 3.0 ES > for my OS. Specs are pretty good, may want

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail for 4K users

2004-09-09 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Joe Aldeguer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > So, I am looking into possibly using SquirrelMail to provide web mail access > for our website members it is currently running on a Dell 2400 Power Edge > dual processor, scsi, 60 GIG HD, 1.5 Gig RAM using White Box Linux 3.0 ES > for my OS. We do the same on

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail for 4K users

2004-09-09 Thread Charles Boling
Just curious, more than anything: Are you hooking SquirrelMail to MS Exchange, or are you going to use a different IMAP server? --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free