Re: [SM-USERS] Reply All does not include the Sender email address.

2015-08-18 Thread Wm Mussatto
On Mon, August 17, 2015 22:17, jimmy cho wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for the reply, > > Yes squirrelmail account is sa...@cccxxith.com > > > logged in as the user sales. the email is from the sender > 3...@gt.com . The mail header is > > > Return-Path: <3...@gt.com> ... > Reply-To

Re: [SM-USERS] Reply All does not include the Sender email address.

2015-08-17 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 8/17/15, jimmy cho wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for the reply, > > Yes squirrelmail account is sa...@cccxxith.com > > > logged in as the user sales. the email is from the sender > 3...@gt.com . The mail header is > > > Return-Path: <3...@gt.com> > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAs

Re: [SM-USERS] Reply All does not include the Sender email address.

2015-08-17 Thread jimmy cho
Hi, Thank you for the reply, Yes squirrelmail account is sa...@cccxxith.com logged in as the user sales. the email is from the sender 3...@gt.com . The mail header is Return-Path: <3...@gt.com> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on cccxith.com X-Spam-Lev

Re: [SM-USERS] Reply All does not include the Sender email address.

2015-08-17 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 8/17/15, jimmy cho wrote: > Hi, > > squirrelmail *Stable version snapshots* *(1.4.23-svn)* > squirrelmail-20150817_0200-SVN.stable.tar.gz > > Centos 7 > php 5.4 > postfix 2.10 > dovecot-2.2.10 > > The Sender is 3...@gt.com Please send full headers. "Sender" without more context is ambig