The closest equivalent to Roundcube that I've seen in SquirrelMail is
Ensignia (old NutsMail - nutsmail.com). It's a SquirrelMail fork based on
1.4.22. It adds a theming engine (including mobile support) and some ajax
here and there, but it's not fully ajax-based like Roundcube. It's got some
very
On 29/11/2012 7:10 μμ, Wm Mussatto wrote:
> I concur that there needs to be a non-AJAX version.
I won't insist on the use of AJAX, BUT a well-designed, pleasent
interface is definitely needed. The bundled themes are simply over-aged
and inadequate - below user expectations. As others have indic
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:00 AM, jerry wrote:
> OK, I just installed Roundcube. I must say, it's a pleasing interface.
> You are
> able to use shift-click and ctl-click on the message list to choose
> multiple messages for
> deletion - unlike SM where you have to individually click on each
> mes
OK, I just installed Roundcube. I must say, it's a pleasing interface.
You are
able to use shift-click and ctl-click on the message list to choose
multiple messages for
deletion - unlike SM where you have to individually click on each
message.
On the other hand, Roundcube is definitely more re
On Thu, November 29, 2012 03:01, Fredrik Jervfors wrote:
>>> I wonder why the design and the functions are so “old-school” like.
>>> It looks like Web 1.0 or before, but I miss some stylish new design
>>> with
>>> the use of AJAX and so on, like other webmailers using today.
>>>
>>> Is there any de
>> I wonder why the design and the functions are so “old-school” like.
>> It looks like Web 1.0 or before, but I miss some stylish new design with
>> the use of AJAX and so on, like other webmailers using today.
>>
>> Is there any development going in this direction, which I missed since
>> yet?
>
Am 27.11.2012 09:28, schrieb francwal...@gmx.net:
> I wonder why the design and the functions are so “old-school” like.
> It looks like Web 1.0 or before, but I miss some stylish new design with the
> use of AJAX and so on, like other webmailers using today.
>
> Is there any development going in
On Thu, November 29, 2012 11:07 am, WJCarpenter wrote:
> I offer both on my server. (I also offer a 3rd which seems a little
> better for mobile users.)
what is the mobile friendly one ?
--
Voytek
--
Keep yourself c
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 01:11:24PM +0100, francwal...@gmx.net wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> This is a real pitty.
>
> For years I used Squirrelmail, but now, when I introduced Roundcube
> to my users, they immediately wanted to switch.
>
> It is done, roundcube is our new webmailer.
>
> Good bye, Squ
On 11/28/2012 04:11 AM, francwal...@gmx.net wrote:
> For years I used Squirrelmail, but now, when I introduced Roundcube to my
> users, they immediately wanted to switch.
> It is done, roundcube is our new webmailer.
I offer both on my server. (I also offer a 3rd which seems a little
better for
Thank you.
This is a real pitty.
For years I used Squirrelmail, but now, when I introduced Roundcube to my
users, they immediately wanted to switch.
It is done, roundcube is our new webmailer.
Good bye, Squirrelmail, it was a nice time after all :)
frank
Am 28.11.2012 um 11:21 schrieb Fredrik
On 28-11-2012 10:21, Fredrik Jervfors wrote:
>
> Roundcube certainly is eye pleasing (I've seen screenshots). I
> haven't
> used it or looked at the code, so I can't compare it to SquirrelMail
> function-wise.
>
Quite simply, Roundcube rocks...
It is unfortunate, but I have not seen any significa
> since some years I have SquirrelMail in use on my servers for my
> customers and me. At the moment I am running the “newest” version 1.4.22
> from 15. July 2011.
>
> I wonder why the design and the functions are so “old-school” like.
> It looks like Web 1.0 or before, but I miss some stylish new
13 matches
Mail list logo
