Re:[SM-USERS] Kerberos Authentication

2005-03-08 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
>>> /** >>> * IMAP authentication mechanism >>> * auth_mech can be either 'login', 'plain', 'cram-md5', or 'digest-md5' >>> */ >>> >>> >>> That probably answers my question, no Kerberos option available at >>> all. Is there a change_log for the 1.5 development versions? I'm >>> curious if Kerberos

RE: [SM-USERS] Kerberos Authentication

2005-03-07 Thread Marc Powell
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:squirrelmail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olivier DUCROT > Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:56 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re:[SM-USERS] Kerberos Authentication > > It should be nice if i

Re:[SM-USERS] Kerberos Authentication

2005-03-07 Thread Olivier DUCROT
relmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: RE: [SM-USERS] Kerberos Authentication >> >> >> /** >> * IMAP authentication mechanism >> * auth_mech can be either 'login', 'plain', 'cram-md5', or > 'digest-md5'

RE: [SM-USERS] Kerberos Authentication

2005-03-07 Thread Marc Powell
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:squirrelmail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Moseman > Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 11:56 AM > To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: [SM-USERS] Kerberos Authentication > > > /

RE: [SM-USERS] Kerberos Authentication

2005-03-07 Thread Scott Moseman
/** * IMAP authentication mechanism * auth_mech can be either 'login', 'plain', 'cram-md5', or 'digest-md5' */ That probably answers my question, no Kerberos option available at all. Is there a change_log for the 1.5 development versions? I'm curious if Kerberos authentication is going to be