On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:39:32PM -0700, p dont think wrote:
> Moreover, please please please upgrade to the HTML_Mail plugin, which
> does not require you to make all the customized modifications that
> HTMLArea does (and doesn't have any of the bugs...)
One extra incentive: spamassassin has bee
> >> On September 3, 7:41 pm Brent Rigsby
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] />> wrote: >> > >
Hello
> Chris,> On Wednesday, September 03, 2003, Chris > Hilts
> >> > wrote...> >>> suggested. But at
> certain times of > the >> > day we spike to over a 100 / on our load average and > things >> > slow
down
> to
> On September 3, 7:41 pm Brent Rigsby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > Hello Chris,> On Wednesday, September 03, 2003, Chris
Hilts
> > wrote...> >>> suggested. But at certain times of
the
> > day we spike to over a 100>>> on our load average and
things
> > slow down to almost a dead stop.
>
> Why
On September 3, 7:41 pm Brent Rigsby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello Chris,> On Wednesday, September 03, 2003, Chris Hilts
> wrote...> >>> suggested. But at certain times of the
> day we spike to over a 100>>> on our load average and things
> slow down to almost a dead stop.
Why is it people
> suggested. But at certain times of the day we spike to over a 100 on our
> load average and things slow down to almost a dead stop. Does anyone have
> a suggestion on how to improve this setup??
You mention the load average, but don't mention exactly what process(es)
are causing the heavy load.
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:30:46AM -0500, Brent Rigsby wrote:
> We have only 200 people using this at the moment
The number of users often isn't the biggest issue. You can have 199
moderate users but if one person has a couple of thousand e-mails in
their inbox then everybody suffers every time t
