Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment problems with Internet Explorer

2007-06-04 Thread work
I had this problem with lighttpd server and IE clients. To solve it, you must disable server's keep-alive requests for IE clients example: $HTTP["useragent"] =~ ".*MSIE.*" { server.max-keep-alive-requests = 0 } Emmanuel38 wrote: > > Hi > > I have squirrelmail 1.4.10a installed

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment Problems

2006-04-13 Thread Alan in Toronto
Tomas Kuliavas wrote: >> Hi. For some reason, I'm having trouble receiving an attachment as an >> Excel >> or Word document. My supplier has sent it to me in both formats, and >> every >> time the attachment comes through as winmail.dat. The file size is 198 >> k, >> so >> I hope it's not a size pr

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment Problems

2006-04-13 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Hi. For some reason, I'm having trouble receiving an attachment as an > Excel > or Word document. My supplier has sent it to me in both formats, and every > time the attachment comes through as winmail.dat. The file size is 198 k, > so > I hope it's not a size problem. Please let me know what I m

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment Problems

2004-02-06 Thread Tabish Mustufa
I still don't have attachments working... does anyone else have any other suggestions? Thanks! -Tabish --- Tabish Mustufa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- p dont think <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You should make sure you do all the suggested > > permissioning (try 777 on > > the attachments

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment Problems

2004-02-03 Thread Tabish Mustufa
--- p dont think <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You should make sure you do all the suggested > permissioning (try 777 on > the attachments dir to be sure) and php config > stuff, including turning > error reporting all the way up, and if you are still > having the problem, > look at potential (proba

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment Problems

2004-02-03 Thread p dont think
> I've been running SquirrelMail 1.4.2 on a Debian > stable system for several months now (using the 1.4.2 > package from Debian testing). > > Recently, I've been getting a "Could not move/copy > file. File not attached" error whenever I try to > attach a file in SquirrelMail. I've checked the > S

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment problems with RH 8 and SM 1,2.11

2003-03-27 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Sten, On Thursday, March 27, 2003, Sten Helge Henriksen wrote... > Hi there! > I have just upgraded from SM 1.2.7 to SM 1.2.11. Apache version > is 2.0.40 and PHP version is 4.2.2. Image attachments are now just > shown as small icons. When I try to download the same images I get > the follo

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment Problems

2003-01-27 Thread mike
To all following this thread, Thanks for the help and hints, squirrelmail is correctly handling attachments now with no problems. Wish I knew the exact problem but I can tell you what I did to fix it. Stripped out my rpm install of apache 2.0.43 and php 4.2.3 - ran a source install of apache 2.0

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment Problems

2003-01-25 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Mike, On Saturday, January 25, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... > I'll buy the PHP upgrade When you say 'buy' I'm assuming you meant you'd take my advice? :) PHP is developed under one of the many GPL style licenses. > [..] I haven't seen any traffic on apache 2x and PHP 4.2.3 - I'll >

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment Problems

2003-01-25 Thread mike
I'll buy the PHP upgrade, but I haven't seen any traffic on apache 2x and PHP 4.2.3 - I'll work on it this Sunday and try again next week. Any known debugging steps in SM or PHP to trace actions during file attachment through compose.php? Thanks for the reply, Mike >> I posted on this issue la

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment Problems

2003-01-25 Thread Jonathan Angliss
> I posted on this issue last week and really got nowhere with it, so I > guess I'll try again. I've got an Squirrelmail (SM) install using SM > 1.40RC1 (but the issue started at 1.2.10 which was my original install), > apache 2.0.43, php 4.2.3, UW IMAP, sendmail 8.11.5 on RH 7.3. Whenever I > at

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment problems

2003-01-23 Thread mike
I've used 4 different hosts for this test, all with client side AV, up to date signatures and scans. The last host I used to test this was a fresh install by a matter of an hour, with the first file created after the final install of M$ patches was an excel file used in the last test. I'll run th

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment problems

2003-01-22 Thread Keith Mastin
>Tried a text file and a zipped binary file - both files came through fine. > No added characters or white spaces (I diffed the original and downloaded >- no changes). > >The binary archive was a tar.gz - came back down size for size and >unpacked OK - MD5'd one file out of each archive and the has

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment problems

2003-01-22 Thread mike
Tried a text file and a zipped binary file - both files came through fine. No added characters or white spaces (I diffed the original and downloaded - no changes). The binary archive was a tar.gz - came back down size for size and unpacked OK - MD5'd one file out of each archive and the hashes ma

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment problems

2003-01-21 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Mike, On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... > I to am having corruption problems with files uploaded through > Squirrelmail. I started at 1.3.2 and upgraded to 1.4RC1 and still > have the issue. Formated documents like M$ Word have several garbage > characters inserted dur

RE: [SM-USERS] Attachment problems

2003-01-21 Thread mike
Hi All, I to am having corruption problems with files uploaded through Squirrelmail. I started at 1.3.2 and upgraded to 1.4RC1 and still have the issue. Formated documents like M$ Word have several garbage characters inserted during their upload through Squirrelmail. Files sent to me from other

RE: [SM-USERS] Attachment problems

2003-01-21 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
Daniel Landau zei: >> >I've never installed any server-side anti-viral software. I'm assuming >> it's >> >happening because something is getting garbled in src/download.php, >> probably >> >in the headers. Are there any SM developers on this list? >> > >> Jonathan answered this... upgrade to 1.2.1

RE: [SM-USERS] Attachment problems

2003-01-20 Thread Daniel Landau
> >I've never installed any server-side anti-viral software. I'm assuming > it's > >happening because something is getting garbled in src/download.php, > probably > >in the headers. Are there any SM developers on this list? > > > Jonathan answered this... upgrade to 1.2.10 Oh, sorry, I replied to

RE: [SM-USERS] Attachment problems

2003-01-20 Thread Keith Mastin
> >I've never installed any server-side anti-viral software. I'm assuming it's >happening because something is getting garbled in src/download.php, probably >in the headers. Are there any SM developers on this list? > Jonathan answered this... upgrade to 1.2.10 --

RE: [SM-USERS] Attachment problems

2003-01-20 Thread Daniel Landau
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:squirrelmail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Keith Mastin > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment problems > > > >> >I'm ha

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment problems

2003-01-20 Thread Keith Mastin
>> >I'm having difficulties with binary attachments: they can't be viewed via >> >the web, and when downloaded the arrive corrupted. I run squirrelmail >> >exclusively under SSL, but I've confirmned that this happen under normal >> >HTTP as well. I have the same results with IE 6 and mozilla runni

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment problems

2003-01-20 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Daniel, On Monday, January 20, 2003, Daniel Landau wrote... >>>I'm running the following setup: >>>squirrelmail 1.2.9 >>>I'm having difficulties with binary attachments > JPEGs, GIFs, and MSWord docs have all arrived corrupt. I examined > two JPEGs side-by-side yesterday, one that I had st

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment problems

2003-01-20 Thread Daniel Landau
> Message: 9 > Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 20:38:53 -0500 (EST) > From: Keith Mastin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment problems > > >Hi, > >I'm running the following setup: > >squirrelmail 1.2.9 > >redh

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment problems

2003-01-19 Thread Doug Lytle
If I recall correctly, someone said that you had to have the Mime plugin installed. Cheers, Doug Lytle Daniel Landau wrote: Hi, I'm running the following setup: squirrelmail 1.2.9 redhat 7.2 apache 1.3.23 php 4.3.0 I'm having difficulties with binary attachments: they can't be viewed via the