Re: [SM-USERS] Apache 2.0 and Squirrrelmail

2002-12-10 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello John, On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, John Locke wrote... > I spent a good part of Saturday trying to get Apache 2.0.43 and PHP > 4.3.0 RC2 up and running. Unlike the 1.3 series, which now takes me > 15 minutes to set up, I spent probably close to 6 hours on it. I started looking at it las

Re: [SM-USERS] Apache 2.0 and Squirrrelmail

2002-12-10 Thread John Locke
I spent a good part of Saturday trying to get Apache 2.0.43 and PHP 4.3.0 RC2 up and running. Unlike the 1.3 series, which now takes me 15 minutes to set up, I spent probably close to 6 hours on it. When I finally got it working, I found that many directives I used in .htaccess files no longer wor

Re: [SM-USERS] Apache 2.0 and Squirrrelmail

2002-12-09 Thread Stephen Carville
On Monday 09 December 2002 02:36 pm, Jonathan Angliss wrote: [snip] > There are many cases of Apache 2 not playing nice with PHP, so it > is always possible, although I'm not sure what'd cause it. I'm > trashing a server right now to get apache 2, and PHP4.3 installed, > so I'll see what I can

Re: [SM-USERS] Apache 2.0 and Squirrrelmail

2002-12-09 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Stephen, On Monday, December 09, 2002, Stephen Carville wrote... > The brower requests the page every five minutes as ordered. If I let > the browser do the refresh, the left hand bar updates correctly. It > is only when I request an update from the link that I have a problem. That is

Re: [SM-USERS] Apache 2.0 and Squirrrelmail

2002-12-09 Thread Stephen Carville
On Monday 09 December 2002 01:25 pm, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > Hello Stephen, > On Monday, December 09, 2002, Stephen Carville wrote... > > >>> I haven't seem this question yet (but it cannot be that unique) > >>> but has anyone had problem with Apache 2.0 and Squirrelmail? I > >>> recently upgrade

Re: [SM-USERS] Apache 2.0 and Squirrrelmail

2002-12-09 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Stephen, On Monday, December 09, 2002, Stephen Carville wrote... >>> I haven't seem this question yet (but it cannot be that unique) >>> but has anyone had problem with Apache 2.0 and Squirrelmail? I >>> recently upgrade my gateway machine to Redhat 8.0 (Actually KRUD) >>> with Apache 2.0.40

Re: [SM-USERS] Apache 2.0 and Squirrrelmail

2002-12-09 Thread Stephen Carville
On Monday 09 December 2002 11:55 am, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > Hello Stephen, > On Monday, December 09, 2002, Stephen Carville wrote... > > > I haven't seem this question yet (but it cannot be that unique) > > but has anyone had problem with Apache 2.0 and Squirrelmail? I > > recently upgrade my g

Re: [SM-USERS] Apache 2.0 and Squirrrelmail

2002-12-09 Thread Stephen Carville
On Monday 09 December 2002 11:55 am, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > Hello Stephen, > On Monday, December 09, 2002, Stephen Carville wrote... > > > I haven't seem this question yet (but it cannot be that unique) > > but has anyone had problem with Apache 2.0 and Squirrelmail? I > > recently upgrade my g

Re: [SM-USERS] Apache 2.0 and Squirrrelmail

2002-12-09 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Stephen, On Monday, December 09, 2002, Stephen Carville wrote... > I haven't seem this question yet (but it cannot be that unique) but > has anyone had problem with Apache 2.0 and Squirrelmail? I recently > upgrade my gateway machine to Redhat 8.0 (Actually KRUD) with Apache > 2.0.40 and PH

RE: [SM-USERS] Apache 2.0 and Squirrrelmail

2002-12-09 Thread Scott Damron
That has been discussed several times, you may want to search the mail archives for it. Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stephen Carville Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SM-USERS] Apache 2.0 an