Nick-14 wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>I'm running v1.4.20 on a Linux Rackspace cloud server and
> am getting a 'major' slow down on login. It takes anywhere from
> 6-25mins (on one occasion it took an hour) to open the mail when
> I first log in. I see that the Maildir has a
Hi All,
I'm running v1.4.20 on a Linux Rackspace cloud server and
am getting a 'major' slow down on login. It takes anywhere from
6-25mins (on one occasion it took an hour) to open the mail when
I first log in. I see that the Maildir has a lot of files (one
per mess
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:51:59AM -0700, Bob wrote:
> While I don't have the problem any longer, I am troubled too by such a
> dramatic change just by caching the session. Is there something lurking
> in the background I inadvertently worked around?
It is time for the administrator's weapons:
Rainer Sokoll wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 04:24:06PM -0700, Bob wrote:
>
>
>> Thanks for the great suggestions. I went down
>> http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/SquirrelMailPerformance exploring the
>> various solutions. I decided to try an imap proxy
>> (http://www.imapproxy.org). This comp
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 04:24:06PM -0700, Bob wrote:
> Thanks for the great suggestions. I went down
> http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/SquirrelMailPerformance exploring the
> various solutions. I decided to try an imap proxy
> (http://www.imapproxy.org). This completely solved the problem. The
Bob wrote:
> Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>
>> Please do NOT reply offlist
>>
>> On 5/4/07, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 5/4/07, Rainer Sokoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at
Paul Lesniewski wrote:
> Please do NOT reply offlist
>
> On 5/4/07, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/4/07, Rainer Sokoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:34:46AM -0700, Bob wrote:
> Un
Please do NOT reply offlist
On 5/4/07, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Lesniewski wrote:
> > On 5/4/07, Rainer Sokoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:34:46AM -0700, Bob wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Unless I have this very wrong, DNS isn't needed to get to the login
>
On 5/4/07, Rainer Sokoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:34:46AM -0700, Bob wrote:
>
> > Unless I have this very wrong, DNS isn't needed to get to the login
> > screen, and DNS is running very fast too. This server doesn't get a lot
> > of traffic. Even putting in an invalid
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:34:46AM -0700, Bob wrote:
> Unless I have this very wrong, DNS isn't needed to get to the login
> screen, and DNS is running very fast too. This server doesn't get a lot
> of traffic. Even putting in an invalid user name and password takes a
> very long time to displa
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu 2007-05-03 12:23:17 -0400, Bob wrote:
>
>
>> The squirrelmail functionality is fine, just very very very
>> slow. Any thoughts? I'm stumped.
>>
>
> This sounds like it could potentially be a DNS timeout.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu 2007-05-03 12:23:17 -0400, Bob wrote:
> The squirrelmail functionality is fine, just very very very
> slow. Any thoughts? I'm stumped.
This sounds like it could potentially be a DNS timeout. Is
squirrelmail trying to look up DNS information,
I have been using squirrelmail for some time. I just migrated to a new,
fast server. For reasons I can't understand, it takes over a minute to
display all pages, even the first login screen takes about 20 seconds to
display.. I tried with a brand new email account and the delay was the
same as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
marciano wrote:
> I suppose it is something about sorting because logging in as another user
> who has only empty folders there are no delays
Do you use the 'filters' plugin? Doing your filtering at login in PHP
is very, very slow. If possible, you
Fedora 3, Dovecot.
It takes around 5 minutes to login. Then it is all fine.
If I logout and login again there are no delays.
>top
displays IMAP activity.
I suppose it is something about sorting because logging in as another user
who has only empty folders there are no delays
Thanks for help.
--
> I found that the new SM versions are only slow to my old qmail server,
> they are quite fast when I just replace the IMAP server from old to new.
>
> But I have many users in old qmail server, so I want the new SM versions
> are fast to my old qmail server.
> Any solution?
Migrate their mailb
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] very slow
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:57:50 +0300 (EEST)
> Dear All,
>
>
> I have upgraded SM 1.4.3a and SM 1.5.0 recently to test its integration
> with my current IMAP server. After I login the webmail, th
> Dear All,
>
>
> I have upgraded SM 1.4.3a and SM 1.5.0 recently to test its integration
> with my current IMAP server. After I login the webmail, the left frame come
> out quite fast, but it takes very long time (around 1 min) for the right
> frame to come out. It is unacceptable slow!
>
>
>
Dear All,
I have upgraded SM 1.4.3a and SM 1.5.0 recently to test its integration with
my current IMAP server.
After I login the webmail, the left frame come out quite fast, but it takes
very long time (around 1 min) for the right frame to come out.
It is unacceptable slow!
Both SM 1.4.3a and SM
19 matches
Mail list logo
