>> smtpd_tls_security_level = may
>> smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes
>>>
>>> Your postfix configuration requires StartTLS on 587 port. Turn off
>>> starttls requirement and SquirrelMail 1.4 will be able to use it. If you
>>> don't want to turn it off, you are free to backport starttls support
>>>
smtpd_tls_security_level = may
smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes
>
> Your postfix configuration requires StartTLS on 587 port. Turn off
> starttls requirement and SquirrelMail 1.4 will be able to use it. If you
> don't want to turn it off, you are free to backport starttls support from
> 1.5.x. A
I now have Thunderbird connecting remotely to 587 and Squirrelmail
connecting locally to 587 without encryption or authentication. Do
you see any problems with my config? Please consider everything else
default.
master.cf:
submission inet n - n
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Grant wrote:
>>> I now have Thunderbird connecting remotely to 587 and Squirrelmail
>>> connecting locally to 587 without encryption or authentication. Do
>>> you see any problems with my config? Please consider everything else
>>> default.
>>>
>>> master.cf:
>>>
>> I now have Thunderbird connecting remotely to 587 and Squirrelmail
>> connecting locally to 587 without encryption or authentication. Do
>> you see any problems with my config? Please consider everything else
>> default.
>>
>> master.cf:
>>
>> submission inet n - n - -
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Grant wrote:
>> Squirrelmail runs on the same machine as postfix and sends mail fine
Is there any reason you need an encrypted connection when sending mail
on the localhost? This just creates unnecessary overhead and is
usually avoided if th
> Squirrelmail runs on the same machine as postfix and sends mail fine
>>>
>>> Is there any reason you need an encrypted connection when sending mail
>>> on the localhost? This just creates unnecessary overhead and is
>>> usually avoided if the connection is not over public networks. It's
>>>
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Grant wrote:
Squirrelmail runs on the same machine as postfix and sends mail fine
>>
>> Is there any reason you need an encrypted connection when sending mail
>> on the localhost? This just creates unnecessary overhead and is
>> usually avoided if the connecti
>>> Squirrelmail runs on the same machine as postfix and sends mail fine
>
> Is there any reason you need an encrypted connection when sending mail
> on the localhost? This just creates unnecessary overhead and is
> usually avoided if the connection is not over public networks. It's
> trivial to
>>> Squirrelmail runs on the same machine as postfix and sends mail fine
>
> Is there any reason you need an encrypted connection when sending mail
> on the localhost? This just creates unnecessary overhead and is
> usually avoided if the connection is not over public networks. It's
> trivial to
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Grant wrote:
>> Squirrelmail runs on the same machine as postfix and sends mail fine
Is there any reason you need an encrypted connection when sending mail
on the localhost? This just creates unnecessary overhead and is
usually avoided if the connection is not ove
> Squirrelmail runs on the same machine as postfix and sends mail fine
> when postfix is configured for smtps 465. I read smtps is deprecated
> so I switched postfix to submission 587 and changed the port in
> squirrelmail's config but squirrelmail will no longer send mail.
> Thunderbird sends mai
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 16:59 -0800, Grant wrote:
> Squirrelmail runs on the same machine as postfix and sends mail fine
> when postfix is configured for smtps 465. I read smtps is deprecated
> so I switched postfix to submission 587 and changed the port in
> squirrelmail's config but squirrelmail
Squirrelmail runs on the same machine as postfix and sends mail fine
when postfix is configured for smtps 465. I read smtps is deprecated
so I switched postfix to submission 587 and changed the port in
squirrelmail's config but squirrelmail will no longer send mail.
Thunderbird sends mail fine ove
14 matches
Mail list logo
