Re: [SM-USERS] sh: /usr/sbin/sendmail: Permission denied

2004-12-16 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> That's what i see in httpd/error_log. Everything works > fine but as you see, I can't send any mail. I've > looked at a different (working perfectly) FC2 box and > the sendmail permissions are the same: > > -rwxr-sr-x 1 root smmsp 732356 Sep 1 05:16 > /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail > > other th

Re: [SM-USERS] sh: /usr/sbin/sendmail: Permission denied

2004-12-16 Thread Uttiya Chowdhury
I think one suspect is the SE-Linux thingy. Try ls -Z on sendmail and see if security contexts are set properly. --- Tomas Kuliavas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > That's what i see in httpd/error_log. Everything > works > > fine but as you see, I can't send any mail. I've > > looked at a diff

[SM-USERS] sh: /usr/sbin/sendmail: Permission denied

2004-12-16 Thread Eldon
That's what i see in httpd/error_log. Everything works fine but as you see, I can't send any mail. I've looked at a different (working perfectly) FC2 box and the sendmail permissions are the same: -rwxr-sr-x 1 root smmsp 732356 Sep 1 05:16 /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail other than add a calendar

Re: [SM-USERS] sh: /usr/sbin/sendmail: Permission denied

2004-12-16 Thread William Hooper
Eldon said: > In fact it was selinux that caused this. If i set > /etc/selinux/config to disabled, the problems vanish. > Since the default during install of FC3 is enforcing, > I would imagine this will be a common issue. > What is a sensible recommended policy? 1) Set Squirrelmail to use SMTP

[SM-USERS] sh: /usr/sbin/sendmail: Permission denied

2004-12-15 Thread Eldon
In fact it was selinux that caused this. If i set /etc/selinux/config to disabled, the problems vanish. Since the default during install of FC3 is enforcing, I would imagine this will be a common issue. What is a sensible recommended policy? The default is -rwxr-sr-x root smmspsystem_u: